Abstract:Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks due to their impressive capabilities as few-shot learners. Recent techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, have significantly advanced multi-step reasoning by introducing step-by-step decomposition, achieving state-of-the-art results on complex reasoning benchmarks. However, these approaches often rely on static prompting templates that do not adapt to task complexity or errors during the reasoning process. In this work, we introduce Adaptive Prompting, a dynamic and iterative framework designed to enhance reasoning by incorporating real-time adjustments to prompt structures and validation <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://mechanisms.Experimental" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> results demonstrate that Adaptive Prompting significantly improves performance on diverse reasoning benchmarks, including arithmetic reasoning (GSM8K, MultiArith), logical reasoning and commonsense tasks, achieving substantial accuracy gains compared to static prompting baselines. By integrating guided prompts, intermediate validation, and self-corrective steps, our approach enables smaller models to achieve competitive performance with larger counterparts, such as GPT-4, while maintaining computational efficiency. The framework achieves this without requiring fine-tuning or task-specific training data, highlighting the untapped potential of iterative reasoning methods.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the limitations of existing large - language models (LLMs) when dealing with complex reasoning tasks. Although existing methods such as Chain - of - Thought (CoT) prompting techniques have significantly improved the ability of multi - step reasoning, these methods usually rely on static prompt templates and cannot be dynamically adjusted according to the complexity of the task or errors in the reasoning process. This results in insufficient consistency and robustness when dealing with complex tasks. To solve these problems, the author introduces a new framework named **Adaptive Prompting**. This framework improves the reasoning ability in the following aspects: 1. **Dynamically adjust the prompt structure**: Adjust the content and structure of the prompt in real - time according to the complexity of the task and the performance of the model, so as to guide the model to reason more effectively. 2. **Intermediate verification mechanism**: Introduce verification steps in the reasoning process to ensure the accuracy of each step and reduce the accumulation of errors. 3. **Self - correction step**: Through the feedback mechanism, allow the model to self - correct after finding errors, improving the reliability of the final output. The experimental results show that adaptive prompting significantly improves the performance on multiple reasoning benchmark tests, including arithmetic reasoning (GSM8K, MultiArith), logical reasoning and common - sense tasks, and its performance can even be comparable to that of larger models (such as GPT - 4). In addition, this method does not require fine - tuning of the model or the use of task - specific data, thus maintaining computational efficiency. In general, this paper aims to improve the performance of small models in complex reasoning tasks by optimizing the reasoning process itself rather than simply increasing the size of the model.

Think Beyond Size: Adaptive Prompting for More Effective Reasoning

Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning

Code Prompting: a Neural Symbolic Method for Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models

Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models

Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models

Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models

An automatically discovered chain-of-thought prompt generalizes to novel models and datasets

Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models

Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models

Boosting of Thoughts: Trial-and-Error Problem Solving with Large Language Models

Prompt Space Optimizing Few-shot Reasoning Success with Large Language Models

R$^3$ Prompting: Review, Rephrase and Resolve for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models under Noisy Context

Unlocking Structured Thinking in Language Models with Cognitive Prompting

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting

Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models

Pattern-Aware Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models

Iteratively Prompt Pre-trained Language Models for Chain of Thought

What Makes Large Language Models Reason in (Multi-Turn) Code Generation?

Stress Testing Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models