Abstract:Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) enable AI agents to go beyond simply supporting human activities and, instead, take more control in team decision-making. While significant literature has studied human-AI collaboration through the lens of AI as a "second opinion system," this type of interaction is not fully representative of many human-human team collaboration scenarios, such as scenarios where each decision maker is granted equal voting rights for the team decision. In this research, we explore how imparting AI agents with equal voting rights to the human impacts human-AI decision-making and team performance. Using a human subjects experiment in which participants collaborate with two AI teammates for truss structure (aka, bridge ) design, we manipulate a series of voting scenarios (e.g., AI agents outvoting the human vs. AI agents agreeing with the human) and AI performance levels (high vs. low performing). The results indicate that changes in human self-confidence are not consistent with whether the quality of the final team-voted design action is advantageous or disadvantageous relative to their own actions. The results also show that when humans are outvoted by their AI teammates, they do not show strong negative emotional reactions if the team-voted decision has an advantageous outcome. Additionally, AI performance significantly influences the human-AI team decision-making process and even one low-performing AI (i.e., an AI that is frequently incorrect) on the team can significantly deteriorate team performance. Taken together, this research provides empirical evidence on the effects of AI voting with equal decision authority on human-AI collaboration, as well as valuable insights supporting real-world applications of human-AI collaboration via voting.

Give Me a Choice: The Consequences of Restricting Choices Through AI-Support for Perceived Autonomy, Motivational Variables, and Decision Performance

Human Designers' Dynamic Confidence and Decision-Making When Working with More than One AI

The Role of Heuristics and Biases During Complex Choices with an AI Teammate

Decision Making Strategies and Team Efficacy in Human-AI Teams

Raising the Stakes: Performance Pressure Improves AI-Assisted Decision Making

Three Challenges for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

Towards Effective Human-AI Decision-Making: The Role of Human Learning in Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice

Questioning AI: Promoting Decision-Making Autonomy Through Reflection

AI as Co-Leader: Effects of Human Consideration and AI Structure Behaviors on Leadership Effectiveness and Neural Activation

To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making

Beyond Recommendations: From Backward to Forward AI Support of Pilots' Decision-Making Process

Effects of a Social Robot's Autonomy and Group Orientation on Human Decision-Making

Constraining the Sense of Agency in Human-Machine Interaction

How Time Pressure in Different Phases of Decision-Making Influences Human-AI Collaboration

Knowing When to Pass: The Effect of AI Reliability in Risky Decision Contexts

Shared Autonomy with IDA: Interventional Diffusion Assistance

Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for Teamwork

How Being Outvoted by AI Teammates Impacts Human-AI Collaboration

AI Decision Making with Dignity? Contrasting Workers’ Justice Perceptions of Human and AI Decision Making in a Human Resource Management Context

Who should decide how limited healthcare resources are prioritized? Autonomous technology as a compelling alternative to humans

The Dilemma of Decision-Making in the Real World: When Robots Struggle to Make Choices Due to Situational Constraints