Abstract:In recent years collaborative robots have become major market drivers in industry 5.0, which aims to incorporate them alongside humans in a wide array of settings ranging from welding to rehabilitation. Improving human-machine collaboration entails using computational algorithms that will save processing as well as communication cost. In this study we have constructed an agent that can choose when to cooperate using an optimal strategy. The agent was designed to operate in the context of divergent interest tacit coordination games in which communication between the players is not possible and the payoff is not symmetric. The agent's model was based on a behavioral model that can predict the probability of a player converging on prominent solutions with salient features (e.g., focal points) based on the player's Social Value Orientation (SVO) and the specific game features. The SVO theory pertains to the preferences of decision makers when allocating joint resources between themselves and another player in the context of behavioral game theory. The agent selected stochastically between one of two possible policies, a greedy or a cooperative policy, based on the probability of a player to converge on a focal point. The distribution of the number of points obtained by the autonomous agent incorporating the SVO in the model was better than the results obtained by the human players who played against each other (i.e., the distribution associated with the agent had a higher mean value). Moreover, the distribution of points gained by the agent was better than any of the separate strategies the agent could choose from, namely, always choosing a greedy or a focal point solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to construct an intelligent agent that maximizes its utility by incorporating the belief system of the player in the context of tacit bargaining. This reward-maximizing strategy selection process based on the SVO can also be potentially applied in other human-machine contexts, including multiagent systems.

Learning responsibility allocations for multi-agent interactions: A differentiable optimization approach with control barrier functions

Learning Responsibility Allocations for Safe Human-Robot Interaction with Applications to Autonomous Driving

Learning Observation-Based Certifiable Safe Policy for Decentralized Multi-Robot Navigation

Responsibility-associated Multi-agent Collision Avoidance with Social Preferences

Risk-aware Safe Control for Decentralized Multi-agent Systems via Dynamic Responsibility Allocation

Who is Responsible? Explaining Safety Violations in Multi-Agent Cyber-Physical Systems

Safe Multiagent Learning with Soft Constrained Policy Optimization in Real Robot Control

Safe Multi-Agent Interaction through Robust Control Barrier Functions with Learned Uncertainties

Optimizing Delegation in Collaborative Human-AI Hybrid Teams

Learning Adaptive Safety for Multi-Agent Systems

Complex accident, clear responsibility

Mitigating Side Effects in Multi-Agent Systems Using Blame Assignment

Safe Neural Control for Non-Affine Control Systems with Differentiable Control Barrier Functions

Robustness and Adaptability of Reinforcement Learning-Based Cooperative Autonomous Driving in Mixed-Autonomy Traffic

Decentralized Safe and Scalable Multi-Agent Control under Limited Actuation

Efficient Learning of Safe Driving Policy via Human-AI Copilot Optimization

Building Safer Autonomous Agents by Leveraging Risky Driving Behavior Knowledge

Responsible Emergent Multi-Agent Behavior

Using a Stochastic Agent Model to Optimize Performance in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games

Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Learning-based Online Optimization for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Fleet Control