Cooperate or Compete: Coalition Formation in Congestion Games

Riya Sultana,Veeraruna Kavitha
2024-10-09
Abstract:This paper investigates the potential benefits of cooperation in scenarios where finitely many agents compete for shared resources, leading to congestion and thereby reduced rewards. By appropriate coordination the members of the cooperating group (a.k.a., coalition) can minimize the congestion losses due to inmates, while efficiently facing the competition from outsiders (coalitions indulge in a non-cooperative congestion game). The quest in this paper is to identify the stable partition of coalitions that are not challenged by a new coalition. In contrast to the traditional cooperative games, the worth of a coalition in our game also depends upon the arrangement of the opponents. Every arrangement leads to a partition and a corresponding congestion game; the resultant Nash equilibria (NEs) dictate the `worth'. The analysis is further complicated due to the presence of multiple NEs for each such game.
Computer Science and Game Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether, in congestion games where a limited number of agents (or players) compete for shared resources, appropriate cooperation and coordination can reduce the losses caused by congestion and increase the overall benefits. Specifically, the paper explores the following issues: 1. **Balance between cooperation and competition**: In the case where multiple agents compete for shared resources, can appropriate collaboration reduce congestion losses and how to effectively respond to external competition? 2. **Identification of stable coalitions**: How to determine a stable coalition partition that will not be challenged by new coalitions? Here, a coalition refers to a cooperative group among agents. 3. **Influencing factors of coalition value**: The value of a coalition depends not only on the arrangement of members within the coalition but also on the arrangement of opponents (i.e., other coalitions). Each arrangement leads to a partition and a corresponding congestion game, and the final Nash equilibria (NEs) determine the "value". 4. **Impact of communication costs on stability**: How do the costs of communication and coordination affect the stability of coalitions? When communication costs are high, some coalitions may become unstable, while other types of coalitions may become more stable. ### Main findings - **Stability of the grand coalition**: The grand coalition (GC) composed of all players is stable in some cases, but in more realistic cases, the grand coalition is often not stable. - **Stability of other coalitions**: In more realistic scenarios, a coalition with a single non - singleton group may be stable, or no coalition may be stable. - **Possibility of cyclic behavior**: When no coalition is stable, players may keep cycling through different cooperation arrangements in pursuit of better self - interested results. ### Conclusion This research reveals the stability of different coalition partitions under congested resource conditions and how the costs of coordination efforts affect these stabilities. The study finds that under more realistic parameter conditions, it is usually other coalitions rather than the grand coalition that are more stable. This is different from the common conclusion in most literature regarding the stability of the grand coalition, mainly due to more realistic modeling of cooperative and non - cooperative aspects.