Abstract:Unpredictability of battery lifetime has been a key stumbling block to technology advancement of safety-critical systems such as electric vehicles and stationary energy storage systems. In this work, we present a novel hybrid fusion strategy that combines physics-based and data-driven approaches to accurately predict battery capacity. This strategy achieves an average estimation error of only 0.63% over the entire battery lifespan, utilizing merely 45 real-world data segments along with over 1.7 million simulated data segments derived from random partial charging cycles. By leveraging a thoroughly validated physics-based battery model, we extract typical aging patterns from laboratory aging data and extend them into a more comprehensive parameter space, encompassing diverse battery aging states in potential real-world applications while accounting for practical cell-to-cell variations. By bridging the gap between controlled laboratory experiments and real-world usage scenarios, this method highlights the significant potential of transferring underlying knowledge from high-fidelity physics-based models to data-driven models for predicting the behavior of complex dynamical systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The key problem that this paper attempts to solve is the uncertainty in the life prediction of lithium - ion batteries in safety - critical systems such as electric vehicles and stationary energy storage systems. Specifically, the author proposes a new hybrid fusion strategy, aiming to combine physics - based models and data - driven methods to accurately predict battery capacity (i.e., the state of health of the battery, SOH), thereby overcoming the limitations of a single method.
### Main problems
1. **Uncertainty in battery life prediction**:
- The unpredictable decline in battery capacity, power, and safety over time seriously affects its performance, reliability, and safety.
- Accurately assessing the state of health (SOH) of the battery is crucial for slowing down early degradation and prolonging battery life.
2. **Limitations of existing methods**:
- **Physics - based models**: Although they can well capture the electrochemical reactions and aging mechanisms inside the battery, they require in - depth professional knowledge, and the high non - linearity and complex parameterization of the models often make them difficult to be widely applied.
- **Data - driven methods**: Although they can bypass the need for complex physical principles inside the battery, they rely on a large amount of high - quality training data and are difficult to effectively generalize under new conditions, affecting interpretability.
### Solutions
The author proposes a **hybrid fusion strategy** that combines physics - based models and data - driven methods, specifically including the following aspects:
1. **Utilizing a small amount of real - world data**:
- Only 45 segments of real - world data fragments and more than 1.7 million segments of data fragments simulated from random partial charge cycles are used, achieving an average estimation error of only 0.63% throughout the entire battery life cycle.
2. **Extracting typical aging patterns**:
- Through the verified physics - based battery model, typical aging patterns are extracted from laboratory aging data and extended to a more comprehensive parameter space, covering various battery aging states in potential practical applications.
3. **Bridging the gap between the laboratory and practical application scenarios**:
- Transfer the knowledge of the high - fidelity physics - based model to the data - driven model for predicting the behavior of complex dynamic systems.
4. **Application of transfer learning**:
- Utilize the pre - trained model and a small amount of real - world data to diagnose the state of health of lithium - ion batteries through transfer learning.
### Formula representation
- **Calculation of the maximum available capacity of the electrode**:
\[
Q=\frac{A F L_p\epsilon_{s,p}(\theta_{p,100\%}-\theta_{p,0\%})c_{max,p}}{3600}=\frac{A F L_n\epsilon_{s,n}(\theta_{n,100\%}-\theta_{n,0\%})c_{max,n}}{3600}
\]
where:
- \(Q\) is the battery capacity,
- \(F\) is the Faraday constant,
- \(\epsilon_s\) is the volume fraction of the active material,
- \(\theta\) is the electrochemical stoichiometric number, defined as the ratio of the lithium - ion concentration to the maximum lithium - ion concentration of the electrode material.
- **Update formula of the adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm**:
\[
\begin{cases}
x_{n,k}=x_{n,k - 1}+V_{n,k - 1}\\
V_{n,k}=V_{n,k - 1}*w + c_1r_1(P_{n,best}-x_{n,k})+c_2r_2(P_{group,best}-x_{n,k})\\
w_{n,k}=
\begin{cases}
w_{min}+(w_{max}-w_{min})\frac{f(x_{n,k})-f_{min}}{f_{average}-f_{min}}, & \text{if } f(x_{n,k})\leq f_{average}\\
w_{max}, & \text{if }
\end{cases}
\end{cases}
\]