Abstract:Chemputation is the process of programming chemical robots to do experiments using a universal symbolic language, but the literature can be error prone and hard to read due to ambiguities. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various domains, including natural language processing, robotic control, and more recently, chemistry. Despite significant advancements in standardizing the reporting and collection of synthetic chemistry data, the automatic reproduction of reported syntheses remains a labour-intensive task. In this work, we introduce an LLM-based chemical research agent workflow designed for the automatic validation of synthetic literature procedures. Our workflow can autonomously extract synthetic procedures and analytical data from extensive documents, translate these procedures into universal XDL code, simulate the execution of the procedure in a hardware-specific setup, and ultimately execute the procedure on an XDL-controlled robotic system for synthetic chemistry. This demonstrates the potential of LLM-based workflows for autonomous chemical synthesis with Chemputers. Due to the abstraction of XDL this approach is safe, secure, and scalable since hallucinations will not be chemputable and the XDL can be both verified and encrypted. Unlike previous efforts, which either addressed only a limited portion of the workflow, relied on inflexible hard-coded rules, or lacked validation in physical systems, our approach provides four realistic examples of syntheses directly executed from synthetic literature. We anticipate that our workflow will significantly enhance automation in robotically driven synthetic chemistry research, streamline data extraction, improve the reproducibility, scalability, and safety of synthetic and experimental chemistry.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the rapid verification and automated execution of synthetic experimental data in chemical literature. Specifically, the authors focus on the following key issues: 1. **Errors and Ambiguities in Chemical Literature**: Chemical literature may contain incorrect or ambiguous descriptions, making it difficult to accurately understand and repeat experiments. 2. **Challenges in Automatically Verifying Synthetic Literature**: Despite progress in standardizing the reporting and collection of synthetic chemical data, automatically reproducing reported synthetic processes remains a labor - intensive task. 3. **Lack of a Comprehensive Workflow**: Previous attempts have either addressed only part of the workflow, relied on inflexible hard - coded rules, or lacked verification in physical systems. To solve these problems, the authors introduce an Agent - based Chemical Research Workflow using Large Language Models (ACRA), aiming to achieve the following goals: - **Automated Extraction**: Automatically extract synthetic procedures and analysis data from the literature. - **Standardization and Translation**: Convert these procedures into the universal XDL code, a language that can represent chemical reaction steps unambiguously. - **Simulation and Execution**: Simulate the execution of the procedures in a specific hardware setup and finally execute these procedures on a controlled robotic system. - **Verification and Improvement**: Ensure the correctness and executability of the generated XDL code through a multi - stage verification process and iteratively improve any errors. This method not only improves the degree of automation but also significantly enhances the repeatability, scalability, and safety of synthetic chemical research. In this way, the authors demonstrate how to use LLM technology to accelerate the verification of chemical literature and the execution of automated experiments. ### Formula Presentation In this article, although no complex mathematical formulas are directly involved, some concepts related to the Chemical Description Language (XDL) are mentioned. For example, XDL is used to represent chemical reaction steps and reagents, as well as the available hardware configurations. Here is a simplified example of XDL: ```markdown \[ \text{XDL} = \{ \text{"steps": [ \{"action": "add", "reagent": "methanol", "amount": "50 mL"\}, \{"action": "stir", "duration": "30 minutes", "speed": "500 rpm"\} ]} \} \] ``` This example shows how to describe a simple chemical reaction step using XDL, including adding methanol and stirring.

Validation of the Scientific Literature via Chemputation Augmented by Large Language Models

An Autonomous Large Language Model Agent for Chemical Literature Data Mining

A Review of Large Language Models and Autonomous Agents in Chemistry

Large Language Models are Catalyzing Chemistry Education

LLMs4Synthesis: Leveraging Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis

Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools

ChemSafetyBench: Benchmarking LLM Safety on Chemistry Domain

Are large language models superhuman chemists?

Automated Experimentation Powers Data Science in Chemistry.

An Automatic End-to-end Chemical Synthesis Development Platform Powered by Large Language Models

Accelerated end-to-end chemical synthesis development with large language models

A multi-agent-driven robotic AI chemist enabling autonomous chemical research on demand

Automated Review Generation Method Based on Large Language Models

Extracting Structured Data from Organic Synthesis Procedures Using a Fine-Tuned Large Language Model

ChemEval: A Comprehensive Multi-Level Chemical Evaluation for Large Language Models

Automatic extraction of FAIR data from publications using LLM

Leveraging GPT-4 to transform chemistry from paper to practice

From Words to Molecules: A Survey of Large Language Models in Chemistry

Structured Chemistry Reasoning with Large Language Models

Large Language Models as Molecular Design Engines

Automated electrosynthesis reaction mining with multimodal large language models (MLLMs)