Abstract:Large near-future galaxy surveys offer sufficient statistical power to make our cosmology analyses data-driven, limited primarily by systematic errors. Understanding the impact of systematics is therefore critical. We perform an end-to-end analysis to investigate the impact of some of the systematics that affect large-scale structure studies by doing an inference analysis using simulated density maps with various systematics; these include systematics caused by photometric redshifts (photo-$z$s), Galactic dust, structure induced by the telescope observing strategy and observing conditions, and incomplete covariance matrices. Specifically, we consider the impacts of incorrect photo-$z$ distributions (photometric biases, scatter, outliers; spectroscopic calibration biases), dust map resolution, incorrect dust law, selecting none or only some contaminant templates for deprojection, and using a diagonal covariance matrix instead of a full one. We quantify the biases induced by these systematics on cosmological parameter estimation using tomographic galaxy angular power spectra, with a focus on identifying whether the maximum plausible level of each systematic has an adverse impact on the estimation of key cosmological parameters from a galaxy clustering analysis with Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We find photo-$z$ systematics to be the most pressing out of the systematics investigated, with spectroscopic calibration biases leading to the greatest adverse impact while helpfully being flagged by a high $\chi^2$ value for the best fit model. Larger-than-expected photo-$z$ scatter, on the other hand, has a significant impact without necessarily indicating a poor fit. In contrast, in the analysis framework used in this work, biases from observational systematics and incomplete covariance matrices are comfortably subdominant.

Methods for robustly measuring the minimum spanning tree and other field level statistics from galaxy surveys

Galaxy 2-Point Covariance Matrix Estimation for Next Generation Surveys

Field-level simulation-based inference with galaxy catalogs: the impact of systematic effects

Joint inference of multiplicative and additive systematics in galaxy density fluctuations and clustering measurements

No Galaxy Left Behind: Accurate Measurements with the Faintest Objects in the Dark Energy Survey

Monte Carlo Techniques for Addressing Large Errors and Missing Data in Simulation-based Inference

Machine Learning LSST 3x2pt analyses -- forecasting the impact of systematics on cosmological constraints using neural networks

Mitigating Systematic Errors in Angular Correlation Function Measurements from Wide Field Surveys

Impact of Large-Scale Structure Systematics on Cosmological Parameter Estimation

Field-level multiprobe analysis of the CMB, integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, and the galaxy density maps

Reducing Model Error Using Optimised Galaxy Selection: Weak Lensing Cluster Mass Estimation

Topological Statistics and the LMT Galaxy Redshift Survey

STAR NRE: Solving supernova selection effects with set-based truncated auto-regressive neural ratio estimation

Bayesian inference from photometric redshift surveys

Robust cosmological inference from non-linear scales with k-th nearest neighbor statistics

Measuring Galaxy Abundance and Clustering at High Redshift from Incomplete Spectroscopic Data: Tests on Mock Catalogs

Using relativistic effects in large-scale structure to constrain astrophysical properties of galaxy populations

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. Paper 0: cross-correlation function measurements

Scalable Statistical Inference of Photometric Redshift via Data Subsampling

Growing Pains: Understanding the Impact of Likelihood Uncertainty on Hierarchical Bayesian Inference for Gravitational-Wave Astronomy