Abstract:Cyber-warfare has become the norm in current ongoing military conflicts. Over the past decade, numerous examples have shown the extent to which nation-states become vulnerable if they do not focus on building their cyber capacities. Adding to the inherent complexity of cyberwar scenarios, a state is usually a member of one or more alliances. Alliance policies and internal struggles could shape the individual actions of member states; intuitively, this also holds for the cyber domain. In this paper, we define and study a simple Cyber Alliance Game with the objective of understanding the fundamental influence of alliances on cyber conflicts between nation-states. Specifically, we focus on the decision of whether to exploit a newly found vulnerability individually or share it with the alliance. First, we characterize the impact of vulnerability-sharing rewards on the resulting equilibrium. Second, we study the implications of the internal power structure of alliances on cyberwar outcomes and infer the expected behavior of Dictator, Veto, and Dummy players. Finally, we investigate how alliances can nudge their members via rewards and punishments to adhere to their defensive or offensive cyber policy. We believe that our results contribute to the fundamental understanding of real-world cyber-conflicts by characterizing the impact of alliances.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore how alliances affect cyber - warfare between countries. Specifically, by constructing and analyzing a simple "Cyber Alliance Game" (CAG), the author has studied the following issues: 1. **The impact of vulnerability - sharing rewards on equilibrium outcomes**: - When a new vulnerability is discovered, member states sometimes choose to exploit it alone and sometimes share it with the alliance. The author analyzes the behavioral changes of member states in choosing to exploit alone or share vulnerabilities under different reward mechanisms. 2. **The impact of the power structure within the alliance on the outcomes of cyber - warfare**: - There may be different power structures within the alliance, such as the Dictator, the Veto player, and the Dummy player. The author studies how these different power structures affect the decision - making of member states in cyber - warfare. 3. **The impact of the basic stance (defensive or offensive) of the alliance on strategy configurations**: - The alliance may adopt a defensive or offensive policy, which will affect the behavior of member states in cyber - warfare. The author analyzes how different types of alliances guide member states to follow their policies through reward and punishment mechanisms. ### Research background Cyber - warfare has become the norm in modern military conflicts, and many countries are thus facing new security challenges. In the past decade, numerous events have shown that if a country does not attach importance to building its cyber - security capabilities, it will become very vulnerable. In addition, most countries are members of one or more alliances, and the policies and internal struggles of these alliances will also affect the behavior of member states in cyber - warfare. ### Main contributions - **Model construction**: Based on the weighted voting theory, the author constructs a simplified cyber - alliance game model for analyzing cyber - warfare decision - making in an alliance environment. - **Strategy analysis**: By gradually increasing the complexity of the model, the author shows how to encourage peaceful, defensive outcomes through reward mechanisms and how the power structure within the alliance affects equilibrium outcomes. - **Practical application**: Although the model is relatively abstract, the author believes that its results are helpful for better understanding and predicting the cyber - warfare decision - making of different alliance member states in the real world. ### Key conclusions - **The role of reward mechanisms**: Appropriate rewards can significantly change the behavior of member states in cyber - warfare, promoting cooperation rather than confrontation. - **The impact of power structures**: The power distribution within the alliance (such as the Dictator, the Veto player, etc.) has an important impact on the decision - making of member states. - **The importance of alliance policies**: Defensive or offensive alliance policies will significantly affect the cyber - warfare strategies of member states. Through these analyses, the author hopes to provide a new perspective for understanding cyber - warfare in the real world and theoretical support for formulating effective cyber - strategies.

The Cyber Alliance Game: How Alliances Influence Cyber-Warfare

Strategic aspects of cyberattack, attribution, and blame

Game-Theoretic Model and Experimental Investigation of Cyber Wargaming

A Vulnerability-Based Model of Cyber Weapons and its Implications for Cyber Conflict

Adversarial Knapsack and Secondary Effects of Common Information for Cyber Operations

How Alliances Form and Conflict Ensues

The Offense-Defense Balance in Cyberspace

SoK: Game-Theoretic Cybersecurity: Assumptions, Models, Gaps, and Bridges

Cyber Arms Transfer: Meaning, Limits, and Implications

Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfare

A Game-Theoretic Model On Coalitional Attacks In Smart Grid

Cyber-Physical War Gaming

Towards an Iterated Game Model with Multiple Adversaries in Smart-World Systems

Are Some Technologies Beyond Regulatory Regimes?

Considerations on the Cyber Domain as the New Worldwide Battlefield

New perspectives on cognitive warfare

The Role of State Actors in Cybersecurity

Do Cyber Capabilities and Cyber Power Incentivize International Cooperation?

The Russia-Ukraine War: An Exploratory Study into the Potential Impact of Cyber Warfare on Asymmetric War Efforts

Cyber Defense as a Complex Adaptive System: A model-based approach to strategic policy design

Learning to Defend by Attacking (and Vice-Versa): Transfer of Learning in Cybersecurity Games