It's Not Easy Being Green: On the Energy Efficiency of Programming Languages

Nicolas van Kempen,Hyuk-Je Kwon,Dung Tuan Nguyen,Emery D. Berger
2024-10-08
Abstract:Does the choice of programming language affect energy consumption? Previous highly visible studies have established associations between certain programming languages and energy consumption. A causal misinterpretation of this work has led academics and industry leaders to use or support certain languages based on their claimed impact on energy consumption. This paper tackles this causal question directly. It first corrects and improves the measurement methodology used by prior work. It then develops a detailed causal model capturing the complex relationship between programming language choice and energy consumption. This model identifies and incorporates several critical but previously overlooked factors that affect energy usage. These factors, such as distinguishing programming languages from their implementations, the impact of the application implementations themselves, the number of active cores, and memory activity, can significantly skew energy consumption measurements if not accounted for. We show -- via empirical experiments, improved methodology, and careful examination of anomalies -- that when these factors are controlled for, notable discrepancies in prior work vanish. Our analysis suggests that the choice of programming language implementation has no significant impact on energy consumption beyond execution time.
Programming Languages,Performance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? The paper titled "It’s Not Easy Being Green: On the Energy Efficiency of Programming Languages" aims to explore whether the choice of programming languages can affect the energy consumption of computer systems. Specifically, the paper attempts to answer the following key questions: 1. **The impact of programming language choice on energy consumption**: Many previous studies have established associations between certain programming languages and energy consumption, but these studies did not clearly identify the causal relationship. Therefore, this paper directly addresses this causal issue, that is, whether the choice of programming languages has a direct impact on energy consumption. 2. **Correcting and improving measurement methods**: Early studies had some methodological flaws in measuring the energy consumption of programming languages, which may have led to biased results. This paper first corrects the errors in these measurement methods and proposes a more accurate measurement method. 3. **Constructing a causal model**: The paper develops a detailed causal model to capture the complex inter - relationships between programming language choice and energy consumption. The model identifies and incorporates several previously overlooked factors that have a significant impact on energy consumption, such as differentiating between programming languages and their implementations, the impact of application implementation itself, the number of active cores, and memory activity. 4. **Eliminating anomalies**: Through experimental evidence and improved methods, the paper shows that some significant differences found in previous studies disappear when these factors are controlled. The final analysis shows that the choice of programming language implementation has no significant impact on energy consumption, except for execution time. ### Main conclusions of the paper - **Energy consumption is proportional to running time**: After strictly controlling various factors, the paper concludes that energy consumption is proportional to the running time of the program and is independent of the choice of programming language. - **Optimize performance to reduce energy consumption**: In order to minimize energy consumption, programmers should mainly focus on optimizing the performance of the program rather than simply relying on the choice of a specific programming language. ### Methodological improvements - **Hardware performance counter data**: Use hardware performance counter data to accurately quantify the average core usage and consider memory activity. - **Forcing single - core operation**: By restricting the benchmark test to run on a single core, eliminate the impact of concurrency differences in different implementations. - **Normalization processing**: Normalize the time to ensure the accuracy of the measurement results. ### Summary This paper re - examines the impact of programming language choice on energy consumption through strict experimental design and causal models, and corrects the methodological errors in previous studies. The research shows that the programming language itself has a limited impact on energy consumption, and the real energy consumption optimization should focus on improving program performance.