Is the Future of Materials Amorphous? Challenges and Opportunities in Simulations of Amorphous Materials

Ata Madanchi,Emna Azek,Karim Zongo,Laurent K. Béland,Normand Mousseau,Lena Simine
2024-10-07
Abstract:Amorphous solids form an enormous and underutilized class of materials. In order to drive the discovery of new useful amorphous materials further we need to achieve a closer convergence between computational and experimental methods. In this review, we highlight some of the important gaps between computational simulations and experiments, discuss popular state-of-the-art computational techniques such as the Activation Relaxation Technique nouveau (ARTn) and Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC), and introduce more recent advances: machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) and generative machine learning for simulations of amorphous matter, e.g., the Morphological Autoregressive Protocol (MAP). Examples are drawn from the amorphous silicon and silica literature as well as from molecular glasses. Our outlook stresses the need for new computational methods to extend the time- and length- scales accessible through numerical simulations.
Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to bridge the gap between computational simulations and experimental methods, especially in the research of amorphous materials. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following key issues: 1. **The Discrepancy between Simulation and Experiment**: - **Differences in Time and Space Scales**: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are usually limited to the time scale of microseconds and the space scale of several hundred to several thousand atoms, while experiments can cover the time scale from seconds to hours and macroscopic - sized systems. - **Differences in Cooling and Deposition Rates**: The cooling rates in simulations (\(10^9\) to \(10^{14}\) K/s) are much higher than those in experiments (\(10^0\) to \(10^2\) K/s), resulting in the glass generated by simulations being more unstable than that generated by experiments. 2. **Complex Energy Landscapes and Statistical Sampling**: - The energy landscapes of amorphous materials are very complex, with many local minima, making it difficult to find the globally optimal structure. Traditional simulation methods are difficult to fully sample these complex energy landscapes, thus affecting the accurate prediction of the properties of amorphous materials. 3. **Accuracy of Force - Field Models**: - There are high - dimensional optimization problems in the parameterization process of classical force - field models, which are prone to fall into local minima, resulting in inaccurate force - field models. In addition, the selection of different exchange - correlation functionals in density functional theory (DFT) will also lead to significantly different potential energy surfaces (PESs), which in turn affects the structure and properties of the model. 4. **The Need for New Computational Methods**: - In order to overcome the above challenges, new computational methods need to be developed to expand the accessible time and space scales and improve the accuracy of simulations. For example, the application and development of methods such as machine - learning interaction potentials (MLIPs), generative machine - learning models (such as the Morphological Auto - Regressive Protocol (MAP)), and new versions of the Activation - Relaxation Technique (ARTn). By solving these problems, the paper aims to promote the research progress in the field of amorphous materials, promote the close integration between theoretical calculations and experimental results, and thus accelerate the discovery and design of new and useful amorphous materials.