Iryna Zabarianska,Anton V. Proskurnikov
Abstract:This work extends the recent opinion dynamics model from Cheng et al., emphasizing the role of group pressure in consensus formation. We generalize the findings to incorporate social influence algorithms with general time-varying, opinion-dependent weights and multidimensional opinions, beyond bounded confidence dynamics. We demonstrate that, with uniformly positive conformity levels, group pressure consistently drives consensus and provide a tighter estimate for the convergence rate. Unlike previous models, the common public opinion in our framework can assume arbitrary forms within the convex hull of current opinions, offering flexibility applicable to real-world scenarios such as opinion polls with random participant selection. This analysis provides deeper insights into how group pressure mechanisms foster consensus under diverse conditions.
Physics and Society,Multiagent Systems,Systems and Control,Dynamical Systems,Optimization and Control
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the influence of group pressure on the formation of consensus in opinion dynamics, and on this basis, expand the existing opinion - dynamic models. Specifically, the authors hope to understand and prove how group pressure can promote individuals to adjust their opinions to reach group consensus under different conditions.
### Main Problems and Research Objectives
1. **The Role of Group Pressure**: The paper emphasizes the importance of group pressure in the formation of consensus, especially when more general time - varying, opinion - dependent weights and multi - dimensional opinions are introduced.
2. **Generalizing Existing Models**: The authors extend previous research results from specific bounded - confidence models to more extensive opinion - dynamic models, including non - linear and non - stationary systems.
3. **The Flexibility of Public Opinion**: Different from previous models, this paper allows public opinion to take any form as long as it is within the convex hull of the current opinions, which makes the model more applicable to real - world scenarios.
4. **Estimation of Convergence Time**: The authors provide a more accurate estimate of the time required for opinions to reach an agreement, especially when all individuals show a certain level of compliance, the group will eventually reach a consensus.
### Model Overview
- **Individuals and Their Opinions**: Consider a group consisting of \(n\) individuals. Each individual \(i\) holds a multi - dimensional opinion \(\xi_i(t)\in\mathbb{R}^d\) at discrete times \(t = 0,1,2,\ldots\)
- **Basic Opinion Dynamics**: Based on the basic opinion dynamics of iterative averaging, allowing the use of arbitrary time - varying and opinion - dependent weight matrices \(W(t,\Xi(t))\), where \(\Xi(t)\) represents the state of the entire system.
- **Public Opinion**: Assume that there is a public opinion \(\xi_{\text{pub}}(t)\), which is a weighted average of all individual opinions and is within the convex hull of the current opinions.
- **Opinion Update Mechanism**: Each individual first performs local opinion averaging according to the basic opinion dynamics, and then adjusts according to the public opinion. The formula is:
\[
\xi_i(t + 1)=p_i(t)\xi_{\text{pub}}(t)+(1 - p_i(t))\eta_i(t),
\]
where \(p_i(t)\in[0,1]\) represents the compliance level of individual \(i\).
### Main Results
- **Asymptotic Consistency**: If the sequence of the minimum compliance levels of all individuals diverges, the opinion dynamics will eventually reach an agreement.
- **Exponential Convergence**: If the compliance levels of all individuals remain consistent and positive, the convergence speed is exponential, and a specific \(\varepsilon\)-consistency time estimate is given.
- **Termination Conditions**: If at a certain moment the compliance levels of all individuals reach the maximum value of 1, the system will reach an agreement immediately in the next moment.
### Numerical Simulation
The theoretical results are verified by numerical simulation, indicating that the group size \(n\) has little influence on the actual convergence time, while the confidence radius \(\varepsilon\) and the compliance level \(p\) have a significant influence on the convergence time. In addition, different forms of public opinion (such as the average opinion of randomly selected individuals) also demonstrate the flexibility of the model.
### Conclusions and Prospects
The authors summarize the role of group pressure in promoting the formation of consensus in opinion dynamics and propose directions for future research, such as further optimizing the convergence time estimate and analyzing the influence of the existence of non - compliant individuals on the system.
In general, through in - depth research on the group pressure mechanism, this paper reveals its potential role in promoting opinion consistency in complex social networks and provides new perspectives and methods for research in related fields.