Intelligent CAD 2.0

Qiang Zou,Yincai Wu,Zhenyu Liu,Weiwei Xu,Shuming Gao

2024-10-02

Abstract:Integrating modern artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly generative AI, holds the promise of revolutionizing computer-aided design (CAD) tools and the engineering design process. However, the direction of "AI+CAD" remains unclear: how will the current generation of intelligent CAD (ICAD) differ from its predecessor in the 1980s and 1990s, what strategic pathways should researchers and engineers pursue for its implementation, and what potential technical challenges might arise? As an attempt to address these questions, this paper investigates the transformative role of modern AI techniques in advancing CAD towards ICAD. It first analyzes the design process and reconsiders the roles AI techniques can assume in this process, highlighting how they can restructure the path humans, computers, and designs interact with each other. The primary conclusion is that ICAD systems should assume an intensional rather than extensional role in the design process. This offers insights into the evaluation of the previous generation of ICAD (ICAD 1.0) and outlines a prospective framework and trajectory for the next generation of ICAD (ICAD 2.0).

Human-Computer Interaction,Graphics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper attempts to address how modern artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly generative AI, can be integrated into computer-aided design (CAD) tools to enhance the intelligence of the engineering design process. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following core issues:

1. **Differences between current intelligent CAD (ICAD) and early ICAD**: Exploring how modern ICAD (ICAD 2.0) differs from ICAD 1.0 of the 1980s and 1990s.
2. **Implementation Pathways**: Investigating the strategic pathways that researchers and engineers should take to achieve ICAD 2.0.
3. **Technical Challenges**: Analyzing the potential technical challenges in realizing ICAD 2.0.

### Background and Motivation

Since the 1960s, computer-aided design (CAD) technology has undergone significant development, from 2D drafting tools to 3D surface and solid modeling systems, and then to feature-based parametric design software. Although CAD technology has made rapid progress in geometric modeling, constraint solving, and feature recognition, recent advancements have been slow, mainly focusing on algorithm optimization and the expansion of application scope.

### Core Issues

1. **Limitations of the Design Process and CAD**: The design process is typically divided into stages such as functional design, conceptual design, preliminary design, detailed design, and design verification. Current CAD technology has limitations in handling the concepts and decisions of the early design stages, especially when dealing with vague, incomplete, or inconsistent concepts.
2. **Role of AI in the Design Process**: Modern AI technologies, especially generative AI, can extract design patterns and generate innovative design solutions, thus compensating for the shortcomings of traditional CAD in creative tasks.
3. **Future Directions**: Exploring the future development directions of ICAD 2.0, including its framework, implementation pathways, and potential challenges.

### Solutions

The paper addresses the above issues through the following steps:

1. **Design Process Analysis**: Conducting an in-depth analysis of the design process to clarify the tasks that AI can undertake at each design stage.
2. **Historical Review and Evaluation**: Evaluating the historical development and limitations of ICAD 1.0 to provide references for the development of ICAD 2.0.
3. **Future Vision and Framework**: Proposing the future vision and framework of ICAD 2.0, emphasizing dynamic geometric information representation and flexible physical information processing.
4. **Technical Challenges**: Discussing the potential technical challenges in realizing ICAD 2.0, such as data-driven machine learning and multimodal AI.

### Conclusion

The main conclusion of the paper is that the ICAD 2.0 system should play an intentional role in the design process rather than an augmentative role. This provides a new perspective for evaluating the previous generation of ICAD (ICAD 1.0) and offers a guiding framework and pathway for the development of the next generation of ICAD (ICAD 2.0).