Toward Neuronal Implementations of Delayed Optimal Control

Jing Shuang Li
2024-10-03
Abstract:Animal sensorimotor behavior is frequently modeled using optimal controllers. However, it is unclear how the neuronal circuits within the animal's nervous system implement optimal controller-like behavior. In this work, we study the question of implementing a delayed linear quadratic regulator with linear dynamical "neurons" on a muscle model. We show that for any second-order controller, there are three minimal neural circuit configurations that implement the same controller. Furthermore, the firing rate characteristics of each circuit can vary drastically, even as the overall controller behavior is preserved. Along the way, we introduce concepts that bridge controller realizations to neural implementations that are compatible with known neuronal delay structures.
Systems and Control,Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about how to implement the behavior of an optimal controller in the animal nervous system. Specifically, the author has studied how to use "neurons" with linear dynamic characteristics to implement the Delayed Linear Quadratic Regulator (DLQR) with a delay and apply it to a muscle model. The paper points out that although optimal controllers are often used in the modeling of animal sensorimotor behavior, it is still unclear how the behavior of these controllers is implemented by neural circuits in the nervous system. Therefore, the main goal of this study is to explore how different neural circuit configurations can implement the same controller behavior, and the firing - rate characteristics of these circuits can be significantly different, even if the overall controller behavior remains unchanged. ### Core problems of the paper: 1. **How to implement delayed optimal control**: Research on how to implement the linear quadratic regulator with a delay within the framework of the nervous system. 2. **Diversity of neural circuits**: Explore how different neural circuit configurations can implement the same controller behavior and how the firing - rate characteristics of these circuits change. 3. **The bridge between the controller and neural implementation**: Introduce concepts and methods to link the implementation of the controller with the known neural delay structures in order to better understand the implementation of the controller in the nervous system. ### Specific research contents: - **Background and motivation**: Introduce the application of control theory in sensorimotor modeling and the two main methods in current research regarding controller implementation: the anatomical - centered method and the learning - centered method. - **Problem setting**: Define the controller and the dynamic system, use a simple neuromuscular model as an example, and describe the input - output relationship of the nervous system. - **Delayed optimal controller**: Construct a linear quadratic optimal controller with a delay and discuss its representation in the frequency domain. - **Compatibility analysis**: Define the controller structure, the delay graph and compatibility, and explore how to evaluate whether a given controller can be implemented under a specific delay structure. - **Create a compatible delayed controller**: Generate a compatible controller structure by decomposing the transfer function \(G(z)\) and ensuring that the relative orders of each part meet the delay requirements. - **Neurons and micro - circuits**: Introduce a simplified "neuron" model, convert the controller structure into a neural circuit, and show different implemented neural circuits. - **Simulation and discussion**: Observe the neuron firing patterns in different circuits through numerical simulation, and verify that different circuits can implement the same controller behavior, but the firing patterns can be significantly different. - **Future work**: Propose future research directions, including introducing more realistic neuron characteristics (such as nonlinear dynamics, threshold, impulse) and considering excitatory and inhibitory neurons. ### Main contributions: - **Provide methods to generate reasonable neural circuits**: Generate neural circuits compatible with specific delay structures through mathematical and control - theory methods. - **Emphasize the non - uniqueness of circuits**: Point out that even the same behavior can be implemented by different neural circuits, which provides a new perspective for understanding the implementation of controllers in the nervous system. - **Provide a theoretical basis for experimental data**: Through theoretical analysis, provide a theoretical basis for future experimental research, and experimental data can be used to verify which circuits actually exist. I hope this information can help you better understand the core problems and research contents of this paper. If you have more specific questions or need further explanation, please feel free to let me know!