Tidal response beyond vacuum General Relativity with a canonical definition

Takuya Katagiri,Vitor Cardoso,Tact Ikeda,Kent Yagi
2024-10-03
Abstract:Tidal effects on compact objects provide profound theoretical insights into the structure of the field equations, and are wonderful probes of the equation of state of matter, the nature of black holes and of the underlying theory of gravity. The natural framework for understanding tides is a perturbative scheme. Here, we point out ambiguities in determining tidal response functions within such a framework, which may lead to bias in constraining physical parameters with gravitational-wave observations if the computed quantities are not properly linked to observables. We propose a Canonical Tidal Response Function (CTRF) definition to compare values of tides in theories beyond vacuum General Relativity in a unified manner. As an example, we provide black hole tidal response functions, including both conservative and dissipative pieces, in various theories of gravity. Tidal dissipation Love numbers for black holes are derived here for the first time in most of the non-Einsteinian theories considered in this paper.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the ambiguity in determining tidal response functions (TRFs) in theories beyond general relativity (GR). Specifically, the author points out that when using the perturbation theory framework to determine these tidal response functions, deviations may occur. If the calculated quantities are not correctly related to observables, this may lead to deviations when constraining physical parameters through gravitational wave observations. To solve this problem, the author proposes a definition of the Canonical Tidal Response Function (CTRF) to compare tidal response values in different theories in a unified manner. ### Main contributions 1. **Identifying the ambiguity**: The paper first points out the ambiguity in determining tidal response functions. This ambiguity stems from the freedom of the form of specific solutions in the perturbation expansion scheme. This freedom allows for an arbitrary shift of the coefficient in front of the homogeneous solution, which directly leads to the ambiguity of the tidal response function in the perturbation framework. 2. **Proposing a solution**: To overcome this ambiguity, the author proposes the definition of the Canonical Tidal Response Function (CTRF). This definition is achieved through two steps: - **Normalizing specific solutions**: By introducing a boundary condition, it is ensured that the asymptotic expansion of the specific solution at large distances does not contain terms proportional to \(\bar{r}^\ell\) and \(\bar{r}^{-\ell - 1}\) (or \(\bar{r}^{\ell + 1}\) and \(\bar{r}^{-\ell}\)), where \(\bar{r}\) is the harmonic radial coordinate. This makes it possible to systematically fix the functional form of the specific solution, thereby comparing tidal response functions in different theoretical settings in a meaningful way. - **Redefining tidal moments**: Use the remaining freedom to redefine tidal moments, ensuring that the induced multipole moments remain unchanged under the redefinition, while adjusting the dissipative tidal numbers (TDNs) to maintain consistency. 3. **Application examples**: As an example, the author provides the values of the tidal response functions of black holes in various gravitational theories, including the conservative part and the dissipative part. This is the first time that the tidal dissipation Love numbers of black holes have been calculated in most non - Einstein theories. ### Formula presentation - **Fourier - domain expansion of the tidal response function**: \[ F_\ell^\pm(\omega)=\kappa_\ell^\pm + i\omega M\nu_\ell^\pm+O((\omega M)^2) \] where \(\kappa_\ell^\pm\) and \(\nu_\ell^\pm\) represent the tidal Love numbers (TLNs) and tidal dissipation numbers (TDNs) of the conservative part and the dissipative part respectively. - **Normalized tidal response function**: \[ \hat{F}_\ell^{C\pm}(\omega):=\kappa_\ell^{(0)\pm}+\epsilon\kappa_\ell^{(1)\pm}+\epsilon^2\kappa_\ell^{(2)\pm} \] \[ + i\omega M\left(\nu_\ell^{C(0)\pm}+\epsilon\nu_\ell^{C(1)\pm}+\epsilon^2\nu_\ell^{C(2)\pm}\right)+O(\epsilon^3,\omega^2) \] where \[ \nu_\ell^{C(0)\pm}:=\nu_\ell^{(0)\pm}-i\frac{E_H^{(0,1)}}{E_H^{(0,0)}}\kappa_\ell^{(0)\pm} \] \[ \nu_\ell^{C(1)\pm}:=\nu_\ell^{(1)\pm}+i\frac{