Abstract:Social and economic policies of governments directly influence the health of the people. These policies, in turn, are determined by the national and foreign controllers of power. Economic and social factors in Turkey during the late 1970s led to a new modelling of the economic system, from a Keynesian to a market-oriented and monetarist model. The state mechanism was also altered to form a centralized, authoritarian regime in order to enforce the requirements of the economy. As a result, the middle class diminished in size, inequalities in income distribution increased, unemployment climbed, the purchasing power of wage earners decreased, government spending for education and health was cut and new oppressive laws were enacted. Health services were already urban-biased and hospital-oriented, but new free-market measures were instituted which promoted private health institutions and attempted to transform state-owned and financed hospitals into self-supporting, independent business enterprises. The only school of public health was closed down; preventive medicine expenditures were lowered while hospital rates and drug prices were increased. All these changes affected the health status of the population. Mortality and morbidity inequalities had already existed between the rich and the poor, men and women, urban and rural settlements, educated and illiterate, West and East, always in favour of the former. However, the new policies exacerbated the inequities. Infectious diseases including tuberculosis increased, nutrition worsened, occupational diseases and work accidents rose to be the highest in Europe. The power-holding minority is not interested in the health of populations and is committed to pursue its social and economic policies. Ad hoc research, especially cross-sectional mortality studies repeated at regular intervals can provide data on the most vulnerable groups as no other valid information exists. There is little hope of these data being used for intervention unless democratic changes take place.

Populist Constitutional Backsliding and Judicial Independence: Evidence from Turkiye

Election forensic analysis of the Turkish Constitutional Referendum 2017

Court-packing and judicial manipulation

Neoliberal Populism in Turkey and Its Crisis

How sovereign is a populist? The nexus between populism and political economy of the AKP

The Effects of Early Republican Period Political System on Democracy in Türkiye in the Context of Elite Power and Political Culture in Contemporary Political Sociology

Through selective activism towards greater resilience: the Czech Constitutional Court's interventions into high politics in the age of populism

Consolidating and Contesting Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Towards a Framework

Public Diplomacy and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: A Retrospective Look at Government Investment in Soft Power

Effectiveness of Incumbent’s Strategic Communication during Economic Crisis under Electoral Authoritarianism: Evidence from Turkey

Does Better Governance Guarantee Less Corruption? Evidence of Loss in Effectiveness of the Rule of Law

How the constitution shapes economic governance: Balancing law and economics in post-war countries

Does Economic Growth Bound Political Rights in Non-democracies? An Empirical Evaluation

Public Confidence in the Judiciary and the Police – Does Respondents Internalize Montesquieu’s Ideas?

Health and social inequities in Turkey

THE SUPREME THEATRE: HOW INDIVIDUALISM AND THE EXTREME PUBLICITY ARE UNDERMINING THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS OF THE SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL

‘Everyday Judicial Populism’ in Hungary

The short‐term macroeconomic impact of populism: A case study of Poland

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

Judging the Market: Judicial Independence, the Rule of Law, and Economic Development

Pre-enlargement Reform Failures in the Western Balkans: Social and Economic Preconditions of the Rule of Law