Abstract:During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered a quick and immediate surge of academic publications on its respective topic. The spike in research publications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak, however, has been like no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilised scientific efforts at an unprecedented scale. In less than 5 months, more than 12,000 research items and in less than seven months, more than 30,000 items were indexed, while it is projected that the number could exceed 80,000 by the end of 2020, should the current trend continues. With the health crisis affecting all aspects of life, research on Covid-19 seems to have become a focal point of interest across many academic disciplines. Here, scientometric aspects of the Covid-19 literature are analysed and contrasted with those of the two previous major coronavirus diseases, i.e., Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). The focus is on the co-occurrence of key-terms, bibliographic coupling and citation relations of journals and collaborations between countries. Interesting recurring patterns across all three literatures were discovered. All three outbreaks have commonly generated three distinct cohorts of studies: (i) studies linked to public health response and epidemic control, (ii) studies on chemical constitution of the virus; and (iii) studies related to treatment, vaccine and clinical care. While studies affiliated with category (i) seem to have been relatively earliest to emerge, they have overall received relatively smaller number of citations compared to publications the two other categories. Covid-19 studies seem to have been disseminated across a broader variety of journals and across a more diverse range of subject areas. Clear links are observed between the geographical origins of each outbreak as well as the local geographical severity of each outbreak and the magnitude of research originated from regions. Covid-19 studies also display the involvement of authors from a broader variety of countries compared to SARS and MERS. Considering the speed at which the Covid-19-related literature is accumulating, an interesting dimension that warrants further exploration could be to assess if the quality and rigour of these publications have been affected.

What we should learn from pandemic publishing

What we should learn from pandemic publishing

The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature

From chaos to clarity: The scientometric breakthrough in COVID-19 research

An Open-Publishing Response to the COVID-19 Infodemic

Pandemic publishing: A bibliometric review of COVID-19 research in the crisis and disaster literature

Exploring Educational Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2020-2021

Mapping the vast landscape of multisystem complications of COVID-19: Bibliometric analysis

Pandemic preparedness: why humanities and social sciences matter

Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty: Evidence from COVID-19

Surprising Resilience of Science During a Global Pandemic: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis

Collaborating in the Time of COVID-19: The Scope and Scale of Innovative Responses to a Global Pandemic

COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields

The Collaboration Patterns of Institution During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Collaboration in the Time of COVID: A Scientometric Analysis of Multidisciplinary SARS-CoV-2 Research

The impact of the COVID pandemic on publication disciplines among major general medical journals: A bibliometric analysis using natural language processing and traditional statistics

Field based research in the era of the pandemic in resource limited settings: challenges and lessons for the future

COVID-19 research: pandemic versus "paperdemic", integrity, values and risks of the "speed science"

Rising to the Challenge of COVID-19: Working on SARS-CoV-2 During the Pandemic

Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV literature

COVID-19 Knowledge Deconstruction and Retrieval: an Intelligent Bibliometric Solution