Abstract:This paper examines the integration of AI's carbon footprint into the risk management frameworks (RMFs) of the banking sector, emphasising its importance in aligning with sustainability goals and regulatory requirements. As AI becomes increasingly central to banking operations, its energy-intensive processes contribute significantly to carbon emissions, posing environmental, regulatory, and reputational risks. Regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act, Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the Prudential Regulation Authority's SS1/23 are driving banks to incorporate environmental considerations into their AI model governance. Recent advancements in AI research, like the Open Mixture-of-Experts (OLMoE) framework and the Agentic RAG framework, offer more efficient and dynamic AI models, reducing their carbon footprint without compromising performance. Using these technological examples, the paper outlines a structured approach for banks to identify, assess, and mitigate AI's carbon footprint within their RMFs, including adopting energy-efficient models, utilising green cloud computing, and implementing lifecycle management.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is integrating the carbon footprint of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the banking industry's Risk Management Frameworks (RMFs) to align with sustainability goals and regulatory requirements. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Environmental Risk**: As AI becomes more widely used in the banking industry, its energy-intensive processes significantly contribute to carbon emissions, leading to environmental risks. These risks include climate change, regulatory compliance, and reputational risk. 2. **Regulatory Compliance**: Regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act, Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the Prudential Regulation Authority's SS1/23 require banks to incorporate environmental factors into AI model governance. Non-compliance with these regulations can result in regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and misalignment with stakeholder expectations. 3. **Technological Advancements**: The paper explores recent advancements in AI research, such as the Open Mixture-of-Experts (OLMoE) framework and the Agentic RAG framework. These technologies can improve the energy efficiency of AI models, reducing the carbon footprint without sacrificing performance. 4. **Integration into Risk Management Frameworks**: The paper proposes a structured approach to help banks identify, assess, and mitigate the carbon footprint of AI. This includes adopting more energy-efficient models, utilizing green cloud computing, and implementing lifecycle management. 5. **Cross-Departmental Collaboration**: The paper emphasizes the importance of cross-departmental collaboration within banks, including cooperation between AI teams, sustainability teams, and risk management teams, to ensure effective management and reporting of AI's carbon footprint. Through these measures, banks can better address environmental risks, comply with regulatory standards, promote sustainable development, and balance innovation with environmental responsibility.

Integrating AI's Carbon Footprint into Risk Management Frameworks: Strategies and Tools for Sustainable Compliance in Banking Sector