From Prohibition to Adoption: How Hong Kong Universities Are Navigating ChatGPT in Academic Workflows

Junjun Huang,Jifan Wu,Qing Wang,Kemeng Yuan,Jiefeng Li,Di Lu
2024-10-20
Abstract:This paper aims at comparing the time when Hong Kong universities used to ban ChatGPT to the current periods where it has become integrated in the academic processes. Bolted by concerns of integrity and ethical issues in technologies, institutions have adapted by moving towards the center adopting AI literacy and responsibility policies. This study examines new paradigms which have been developed to help implement these positives while preventing negative effects on academia. Keywords: ChatGPT, Academic Integrity, AI Literacy, Ethical AI Use, Generative AI in Education, University Policy, AI Integration in Academia, Higher Education and Technology
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to compare the process of the University of Hong Kong from initially banning the use of ChatGPT to currently integrating it into the academic process. The article explores the reasons behind this shift, including concerns about academic integrity and ethical issues, and how to adapt to this change by implementing AI literacy and responsibility policies. The study also examines the development of new paradigms that help to realize the positive impact of AI technology in the academic field while preventing negative effects. Specifically, the paper analyzes the following points: 1. **Initial Ban and Ethical Challenges**: It discusses the reasons why ChatGPT was initially banned by the University of Hong Kong, mainly focusing on academic dishonesty (such as plagiarism, data falsification) and unauthorized use of AI technology. 2. **Transition to Adoption: Policy Reform and AI Literacy**: It describes how the University of Hong Kong gradually changed its policy from a complete ban to a systematic management, ensuring the rational use of the technology through the introduction of AI literacy training. 3. **Integration and Future Impact**: It explores the gradual integration of ChatGPT in the academic environment and its mixed benefits, emphasizing the need to establish good ethical standards in the future to deal with new problems arising from AI applications. 4. **Conclusion**: It summarizes the transformation of the University of Hong Kong from banning ChatGPT to recognizing it as an important teaching aid, which reflects a microcosm of the overall transformation in the field of higher education. The paper calls for the formulation of relevant policies to ensure the rational application of AI technology in education while maintaining high - standard academic integrity. In short, this paper focuses on how the University of Hong Kong responds to the emergence of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, from the initial ban to the current systematic adoption, and explores the academic integrity, ethical issues and policy adjustments involved in this process.