Abstract:We show that measuring the velocity components of hypervelocity stars (HVSs) can discriminate between modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) and Newtonian gravity. Hypervelocity stars are ejected from the Galactic center on radial trajectories with a null tangential velocity component in the reference frame of the Galaxy. They acquire tangential components due to the nonspherical components of the Galactic gravitational potential. Axisymmetric potentials only affect the latitudinal components, v θ , and non-null azimuthal components, v φ , originate from non-axisymmetric matter distributions. For HVSs with sufficiently high ejection speed, the azimuthal velocity components are proportionate to the deviation of the gravitational potential from axial symmetry. The ejection velocity threshold is ∼750 km s −1 for 4 M ⊙ stars and increases with decreasing HVS mass. We determine the upper limit of v φ as a function of the galactocentric distance for these high-speed HVSs if MOND, in its quasi-linear formulation QUMOND, is the correct theory of gravity and either the triaxial Galactic bulge or a nonspherical hot gaseous halo is the primary source of the azimuthal component, v φ . In Newtonian gravity, the HVSs within 60 kpc of the Galactic center may easily have v φ values higher than the QUMOND upper limit if the dark matter halo is triaxial or if the dark matter halo and the baryonic components are axisymmetric but their two axes of symmetry are misaligned. Therefore, even a limited sample of high-speed HVSs could in principle allow us to distinguish between the QUMOND scenario and the dark matter model. This test is currently limited by (i) the lack of a proper procedure to assess whether a star originates from the Galactic center and thus is indeed an HVS in the model one wishes to constrain; and (ii) the large uncertainties on the galactocentric azimuthal velocity components, which should be reduced by at least a factor of ∼10 to make this test conclusive. A proper procedure to assess the HVS nature of the observed stars and astrometric measurements with microarcsecond precision would make this test feasible.

An eccentric transit timing test of modified gravity

Testing gravity with interstellar precursor missions

Testing MOND on Small Bodies in the Remote Solar System

Inside MOND: Testing Gravity with Stellar Accelerations

On the tension between the radial acceleration relation and Solar system quadrupole in modified gravity MOND

Testing Gravity with wide binary stars like $α$ Centauri

Measuring gravitational behavior at short distances in space: A local test for MOND/MOG

On the (im)possibility of Testing New Physics in Exoplanets Using Transit Timing Variations: Deviation from Inverse-Square Law of Gravity

A Test of the MOND Theory and the Model of Dark Matter

A Novel Two-Step Laser Ranging Technique for a Precision Test of the Theory of Gravity

Variable Modified Newtonian Mechanics I: Single Metric Universe

MOND as manifestation of modified inertia

Gravitomagnetic Clock Effect: Using GALILEO to explore General Relativity

From galactic bars to the Hubble tension: weighing up the astrophysical evidence for Milgromian gravity

Probing modified Newtonian dynamics with hypervelocity stars

Testing general relativity in the solar system: present and future perspectives

Towards a realistic setup for a dynamical measurement of deviations from Newton's law: the impact of air viscosity

Parametrized Post-Newtonian Secular Transit Timing Variations for Exoplanets

MONDified Gravity