Abstract:Q-shaping is an extension of Q-value initialization and serves as an alternative to reward shaping for incorporating domain knowledge to accelerate agent training, thereby improving sample efficiency by directly shaping Q-values. This approach is both general and robust across diverse tasks, allowing for immediate impact assessment while guaranteeing optimality. We evaluated Q-shaping across 20 different environments using a large language model (LLM) as the heuristic provider. The results demonstrate that Q-shaping significantly enhances sample efficiency, achieving a \textbf{16.87\%} improvement over the best baseline in each environment and a \textbf{253.80\%} improvement compared to LLM-based reward shaping methods. These findings establish Q-shaping as a superior and unbiased alternative to conventional reward shaping in reinforcement learning.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to address the sample efficiency problem in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Specifically, the paper proposes a new framework—Q-shaping, which leverages domain knowledge provided by large language models (LLM) to accelerate agent training, thereby improving sample efficiency. ### Background and Motivation 1. **Sample Efficiency Problem**: - Reinforcement learning often faces low sample efficiency when solving complex tasks. For example, AlphaGo requires approximately 4 weeks of training on 50 GPUs, learning from 30 million expert Go positions to achieve 57% accuracy. - Similarly, training a real bipedal soccer robot requires 9.0×10^8 environment steps, equivalent to 68 hours of wall-clock time. 2. **Limitations of Existing Methods**: - **Imitation Learning**: Requires expert data. - **Residual Reinforcement Learning**: Requires carefully designed controllers. - **Reward Shaping**: Although practical, the validation process is slow. - **Q-value Initialization**: Requires precise Q-value estimation. 3. **Application of Large Language Models (LLM)**: - The application of LLM in reinforcement learning is increasing, mainly focusing on policy generation and reward design. Although these methods have improved task success rates, the challenge of reward shaping remains unresolved. ### Q-shaping Framework 1. **Concept of Q-shaping**: - Q-shaping is an extension of Q-value initialization that accelerates agent training by directly modifying Q-values without affecting the agent's optimality. - Unlike reward shaping, Q-shaping can directly modify Q-values at any training step without affecting the agent's optimality upon convergence. 2. **Advantages**: - **Rapid Validation**: Q-shaping allows experimenters to quickly validate the effectiveness of heuristic guidance, efficiently optimizing heuristic functions. - **Low Dependency**: Q-shaping has a low dependency on the quality of LLM, as the provided heuristic values do not alter the agent's optimality upon convergence. 3. **Experimental Results**: - Evaluated in 20 different environments, Q-shaping improved each task by an average of 16.87% over the best baseline method and by 253.80% over LLM-based reward shaping methods (such as T2R and Eureka). - These results indicate that Q-shaping is an unbiased alternative superior to traditional reward shaping. ### Conclusion By introducing the Q-shaping framework, the paper successfully addresses the sample efficiency problem in reinforcement learning and demonstrates significant performance improvements across multiple tasks. This provides new directions and tools for future reinforcement learning research.

From Reward Shaping to Q-Shaping: Achieving Unbiased Learning with LLM-Guided Knowledge

Shapley Q-Value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Games

Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward Shaping

Enhancing Q-Learning with Large Language Model Heuristics

Reward Shaping via Meta-Learning

Shaping in Reinforcement Learning by Knowledge Transferred from Human-Demonstrations of a Simple Similar Task.

Shaping in Reinforcement Learning Via Knowledge Transferred from Human-Demonstrations

Shaping Reward Learning Approach from Passive Samples

Highly Efficient Self-Adaptive Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning

Learning Task-Distribution Reward Shaping with Meta-Learning.

Extracting Heuristics from Large Language Models for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning

Multimodal Reward Shaping for Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learning

Learning to Shape Rewards Using a Game of Two Partners

Improving Sample Efficiency of Reinforcement Learning with Background Knowledge from Large Language Models

Choices are More Important than Efforts: LLM Enables Efficient Multi-Agent Exploration

Model-Based Reward Shaping for Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Environments

Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Data

Learning to Shape Rewards using a Game of Switching Controls

A new Potential-Based Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning Agent

Using Natural Language for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning

Shaping Advice in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning