Abstract:Throughout the evolutionary tree, there are gains and losses of morphological features, physiological processes, and behavioral patterns. Losses are perhaps nowhere so prominent as for subterranean organisms, which typically show reductions or losses of eyes and pigment. These losses seem easy to explain without recourse to natural selection. Its most modern form is the accumulation of selectively neutral, structurally reducing mutations. Selectionist explanations include direct selection, often involving metabolic efficiency in resource poor subterranean environments, and pleiotropy, where genes affecting eyes and pigment have other effects, such as increasing extra-optic sensory structures. This dichotomy echoes the debate in evolutionary biology in general about the sufficiency of natural selection as an explanation of evolution, e.g., Kimura's neutral mutation theory. Tests of the two hypotheses have largely been one-sided, with data supporting that one or the other processes is occurring. While these tests have utilized a variety of subterranean organisms, the Mexican cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus , which has eyed extant ancestral-like surface fish conspecifics, is easily bred in the lab, and whose whole genome has been sequenced, is the favored experimental organism. However, with few exceptions, tests for selection versus neutral mutations contain limitations or flaws. Notably, these tests are often one sided, testing for the presence of one or the other process. In fact, it is most likely that both processes occur and make a significant contribution to the two most studied traits in cave evolution: eye and pigment reduction. Furthermore, narrow focus on neutral mutation hypothesis versus selection to explain cave-evolved traits often fails, at least in the simplest forms of these hypotheses, to account for aspects that are likely essential for understanding cave evolution: migration or epigenetic effects. Further, epigenetic effects and phenotypic plasticity have been demonstrated to play an important role in cave evolution in recent studies. Phenotypic plasticity does not by itself result in genetic change of course, but plasticity can reveal cryptic genetic variation which then selection can act on. These processes may result in a radical change in our thinking about evolution of subterranean life, especially the speed with which it may occur. Thus, perhaps it is better to ask what role the interaction of genes and environment plays, in addition to natural selection and neutral mutation.

Genetic bias in repeated evolution of pigment loss in cave populations of the Asellus aquaticus species complex

Convergent phenotypic evolution of the visual system via different molecular routes: How Neotropical cichlid fishes adapt to novel light environments

Mc1r gene in Astroblepus pholeter and Astyanax mexicanus: Convergent regressive evolution of pigmentation across cavefish species

Long-term hybridization in a karst window reveals the genetic basis of eye loss in cavefish

Genetic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity drive troglomorphic character development in European cavefish

Natural selection versus neutral mutation in the evolution of subterranean life: A false dichotomy?

Loss of conserved noncoding elements likely shaped the evolution of regressed phenotypes in cavefish

Contrasting Gene Decay in Subterranean Vertebrates: Insights from Cavefishes and Fossorial Mammals

Comparative transcriptomics reveals the molecular genetic basis of pigmentation loss in Sinocyclocheilus cavefishes

Variable Craniofacial Shape and Development among Multiple Cave-Adapted Populations of Astyanax mexicanus

Long-term balancing selection maintains cryptic color polymorphism in frogs

Parallel phenotypic evolution of two independent cavefish lineages of Astyanax mexicanus (De Filippi, 1854) (Characiformes: Characidae)

Loci associated with cave-derived traits concentrate in specific regions of the Mexican cavefish genome

From darkness to discovery: evolutionary, adaptive, and translational genetic insights from cavefish

Quantitative trait loci concentrate in specific regions of the Mexican cavefish genome and reveal key candidate genes for cave-associated evolution

Balancing selection and the functional effects of shared polymorphism in cryptic species

Repeated Divergence in Opsin Gene Expression Mirrors Photic Habitat Changes in Rapidly Evolving Crater Lake Cichlid Fishes

Evolution of the regulation of developmental gene expression in blind Mexican cavefish

Melanocortin 4 receptor mutations contribute to the adaptation of cavefish to nutrient-poor conditions

Balancing selection maintains cryptic colour morphs

Pseudogenization of Mc1r Gene Associated with Transcriptional Changes Related to Melanogenesis Explains Leucistic Phenotypes in Oreonectes Cavefish (cypriniformes, Nemacheilidae)