Outcomes following Malone antegrade continence enema and their surgical revisions

Brian A VanderBrink,Mark P Cain,Martin Kaefer,Kirstan K Meldrum,Rosalia Misseri,Richard C Rink
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.05.010
Abstract:Background/purpose: The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) channel is an effective means to manage patients with neurogenic bowel; however, complications may occur that may require surgical revision. Specific reports of the outcomes of these interventions are limited. We describe our clinical results following revision of MACE. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients undergoing MACE revision for at our institution between 1997 and 2009. Type of MACE (in situ appendicocecostomy (AC = 247), ileocecostomy (IC = 25), cecal flap (CF = 10)) performed was recorded, time from creation to revision, site of revision, and need for repeat surgical revision were recorded. Results: Of a total of 282 patients that underwent creation of MACE during the study period, 49 patients (17%) required surgical revision. Of these 49 patients, 42 had undergone AC, four had IC and three had CF. Mean time from MACE creation to revision was 19 months. Sixty-eight revision procedures were performed in the 49 patients. Skin level or endoscopic procedures accounted for 52/67 (78%) procedures. Sixteen patients (33%) required more than one revision and three patients (6%) required more than two procedures. Conclusions: Skin level revisions accounted for over three-fourths of MACE revisions. In our series, two thirds of patients requiring revision required only a single procedure, but one third required more than one revision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?