Abstract:Vent channels on Discord, which are chat channels developed for people to express frustrations, can become an informal type of peer support system. This paper is a qualitative study of experiences with vent channels on Discord, examining the experiences of 13 participants through semi-structured interviews. We find that participants are able to meet their needs for social support via vent channels by receiving commiseration, advice, and validation from the responses of others. At the same time, vent channels can lead to frustration when participants have conflicting expectations for their interactions. We suggest ways that Discord or Discord server moderators can provide enhanced structure, clarity, and transparency in order to enable participants to have better experiences in vent channels.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the operating mechanism of "vent channels" on the Discord platform and their impact on participants. Specifically, the research focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Experiences of Venters and Responders**: Understand the experiences of those who express negative emotions in the vent channels (venters) and those who respond to these expressions (responders). 2. **Participants' Expectations and Actual Gains**: Explore what participants hope to obtain through the vent channels and whether they have met these expectations. 3. **How to Improve Vent Channels**: Put forward improvement suggestions so that the vent channels can better meet the needs of participants. ### Research Background Discord is a community platform that allows users to communicate through text, voice, and video. Vent channels are a special type of channel among them, aiming to provide users with a space for expressing negative emotions and receiving support. However, these channels may also lead to some problems, such as inconsistent expectations in interactions or the spread of negative emotions. ### Research Questions In order to deeply understand the functions and impacts of vent channels, the author proposes the following four research questions: 1. What are the experiences of venters on the vent channels? 2. What are the experiences of responders on the vent channels? 3. What do participants hope to obtain through the vent channels? Have they obtained these? 4. How to redesign the vent channels to better meet the needs of participants? ### Main Findings Through semi - structured interviews with 13 participants, the research has the following main findings: - **Purposes and Uses of Vent Channels**: Vent channels are not only a place for expressing negative emotions, but also a place for seeking support and advice. Many participants said that they hoped to get others' understanding and help after venting. - **Users' Self - Disclosure Experiences**: Vent channels promote the sense of connection and authenticity among users. Participants enhance their understanding and connection with each other by sharing their vulnerable sides. - **Responses and Support**: Common response types include sympathy, comfort, verification, and advice. However, sometimes the intentions of responders are inconsistent with the expectations of venters, which may lead to misunderstandings and negative interactions. - **Importance of Structure and Rules**: In order to ensure the effectiveness and safety of vent channels, appropriate structure and rules are necessary. For example, clear norms can reduce unnecessary conflicts and ensure that all participants can get appropriate support. ### Conclusion This research shows that although vent channels provide users with a space for expressing negative emotions and receiving support, their effects depend on the design and management of the channels. In order to improve user experience, Discord or server administrators can enhance the functions of vent channels by providing clearer structure and rules.

Understanding #vent Channels on Discord

Group Chat Ecology in Enterprise Instant Messaging: How Employees Collaborate Through Multi-User Chat Channels on Slack

Moderation Challenges in Voice-based Online Communities on Discord

How Are Communication Channels on GitHub Presented to Their Intended Audience? -- A Thematic Analysis

An exploration of course and cohort communication spaces in Discord, Teams, and Moodle

The Effect of Structural Equation Modeling on Chatbot Usage: An Investigation of Dialogflow

Towards Understanding Emotions in Informal Developer Interactions: A Gitter Chat Study

AI as your ally: The effects of AI‐assisted venting on negative affect and perceived social support

Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community

Platform dialectics: The relationships between volunteer moderators and end users on reddit

A First Look at Developers' Live Chat on Gitter

Users volatility on Reddit and Voat

Turning asynchronicity into an opportunity: asynchronous communication for shared understanding with vision videos

Influences of Web interactivity and social identity and bonds on the quality of online discussion in a virtual community

Coordination and Collaboration: How do Volunteer Moderators Work as a Team in Live Streaming Communities?

Sharing emotions at scale: The Vent dataset

Lived experiences of online harm amongst marginalized and vulnerable individuals in support-seeking communities on Reddit

Why Developers Are Slacking Off: Understanding How Software Teams Use Slack

Understanding and Mitigating Harmful Design in User-Generated Virtual Worlds

Empathosphere: Promoting Constructive Communication in Ad-hoc Virtual Teams through Perspective-taking Spaces

Decoding Social Sentiment in DAO: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Governance Communities