Abstract:Abstract. Central to the development of Earth system models (ESMs) has been the coupling of previously separate model types, such as ocean, atmospheric, and vegetation models, to address interactive feedbacks between the system components. A modelling framework which combines a detailed representation of these components, including vegetation and other land surface processes, enables the study of land–atmosphere feedbacks under global climate change. Here we present the initial steps of coupling LPJ-GUESS, a dynamic global vegetation model, to the atmospheric chemistry-enabled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model EMAC. The LPJ-GUESS framework is based on ecophysiological processes, such as photosynthesis; plant and soil respiration; and ecosystem carbon, nitrogen, and water cycling, and it includes a comparatively detailed individual-based representation of resource competition, plant growth, and vegetation dynamics as well as fire disturbance. Although not enabled here, the model framework also includes a crop and managed-land scheme, a representation of arctic methane and permafrost, and a choice of fire models; and hence it represents many important terrestrial biosphere processes and provides a wide range of prognostic trace-gas emissions from vegetation, soil, and fire. We evaluated an online one-way-coupled model configuration (with climate variable being passed from EMAC to LPJ-GUESS but no return information flow) by conducting simulations at three spatial resolutions (T42, T63, and T85). These were compared to an expert-derived map of potential natural vegetation and four global gridded data products: tree cover, biomass, canopy height, and gross primary productivity (GPP). We also applied a post hoc land use correction to account for human land use. The simulations give a good description of the global potential natural vegetation distribution, although there are some regional discrepancies. In particular, at the lower spatial resolutions, a combination of low-temperature and low-radiation biases in the growing season of the EMAC climate at high latitudes causes an underestimation of vegetation extent. Quantification of the agreement with the gridded datasets using the normalised mean error (NME) averaged over all datasets shows that increasing the spatial resolution from T42 to T63 improved the agreement by 10 %, and going from T63 to T85 improved the agreement by a further 4 %. The highest-resolution simulation gave NME scores of 0.63, 0.66, 0.84, and 0.53 for tree cover, biomass, canopy height, and GPP, respectively (after correcting tree cover and biomass for human-caused deforestation which was not present in the simulations). These scores are just 4 % worse on average than an offline LPJ-GUESS simulation using observed climate data and corrected for deforestation by the same method. However, it should be noted that the offline LPJ-GUESS simulation used a higher spatial resolution, which makes the evaluation more rigorous, and that excluding GPP from the datasets (which was anomalously better in the EMAC simulations) gave 10 % worse agreement for the EMAC simulation than the offline simulation. Gross primary productivity was best simulated by the coupled simulations, and canopy height was the worst. Based on this first evaluation, we conclude that the coupled model provides a suitable means to simulate dynamic vegetation processes in EMAC.

The ARP-GEM1 Global Atmosphere Model. Part I: Description and Speed-up Analysis

The ARP-GEM1 Global Atmosphere Model. Part II: Multiscale Evaluation up to 6 km

GLOBGM v1.0: a parallel implementation of a 30 arcsec PCR-GLOBWB-MODFLOW global-scale groundwater model

ORCHIDEE-MICT (revision 4126), a Land Surface Model for the High-Latitudes: Model Description and Validation

GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers

ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a Land Surface Model for the High Latitudes: Model Description and Validation

A new dynamical core of the Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model with a height-based terrain-following vertical coordinate

Including vegetation dynamics in an atmospheric chemistry-enabled general circulation model: linking LPJ-GUESS (v4.0) with the EMAC modelling system (v2.53)

Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to in Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data

ARAMIS: a Martian radiative environment model built from GEANT4 simulations

Near-surface meteorology during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): evaluation of reanalyses and global climate models

Influence of Parameterization Changes on Arctic Low Cloud Properties and Cloud Radiative Effects in Two Versions of the HadGEM3 Atmospheric Model: GA7.1 and GA6

AGCM-3DLF: Accelerating Atmospheric General Circulation Model via 3D Parallelization and Leap-Format

ACE: A fast, skillful learned global atmospheric model for climate prediction

Grid-Stretching Capability for the GEOS-Chem 13.0.0 Atmospheric Chemistry Model

Impacts of Local Green's Functions on Modeling Atmospheric Loading Effects for GNSS Reference Stations

Improving Parallel Performance of A Finite-Difference Agcm on Modern High-Performance Computers

A machine-learning-guided adaptive algorithm to reduce the computational cost of integrating kinetics in global atmospheric chemistry models: application to GEOS-Chem versions 12.0.0 and 12.9.1

Development of Fine‐resolution Analyses and Expanded Large‐scale Forcing Properties: 2. Scale Awareness and Application to Single‐column Model Experiments

The Earth system model CLIMBER-X v1.0 – Part 1: Climate model description and validation

P-model V1.0: an Optimality-Based Light Use Efficiency Model for Simulating Ecosystem Gross Primary Production