Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) presents a formidable challenge in artificial intelligence, demanding intricate comprehension of legal texts, nuanced interpretation of statutes, and complex reasoning over multifaceted case elements. While recent advancements in natural language processing have shown promise, existing approaches often struggle to capture the sophisticated interplay between facts, legal principles, and precedents that characterize legal decision-making. This paper introduces LegalReasoner, a novel multi-stage framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and integrates domain-specific knowledge for enhanced legal judgment prediction. Our approach encompasses four key stages: 1) legal knowledge infusion, where we pre-train an LLM on a vast corpus of legal literature using contrastive learning techniques; 2) case-law retrieval, employing a graph neural network to identify relevant precedents and statutes; 3) multi-hop reasoning, utilizing a transformer-based architecture with a hierarchical attention mechanism to navigate complex legal arguments; and 4) judgment synthesis, where we employ a generative adversarial network to produce coherent and legally sound judgments. We evaluate LegalReasoner on two diverse datasets: the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) cases and the Chinese AI and Law Challenge (CAIL2018). Our framework demonstrates substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an average accuracy increase of 7.8% across all datasets. Furthermore, we conduct extensive ablation studies and interpretability analyses to elucidate the contributions of each component and provide insights into the model's decision-making process. Our work not only advances the field of automated legal reasoning but also offers a transparent and explainable system that could serve as a valuable tool for legal professionals. By bridging the gap between AI and legal expertise, LegalReasoner paves the way for more efficient, consistent, and fair legal decision-making processes.

Incorporating Precedents for Legal Judgement Prediction on European Court of Human Rights Cases

Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration

ECtHR-PCR: A Dataset for Precedent Understanding and Prior Case Retrieval in the European Court of Human Rights

LegalDuet: Learning Effective Representations for Legal Judgment Prediction through a Dual-View Legal Clue Reasoning

Towards Explainability in Legal Outcome Prediction Models

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

SLJP: Semantic Extraction based Legal Judgment Prediction

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

AutoLAW: Augmented Legal Reasoning through Legal Precedent Prediction

Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework.

Legal Prompt Engineering for Multilingual Legal Judgement Prediction

Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural Networks

Query-driven Relevant Paragraph Extraction from Legal Judgments

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Judgment Prediction Based on Case Life Cycle

Boosting court judgment prediction and explanation using legal entities

Legal Judgment Reimagined: PredEx and the Rise of Intelligent AI Interpretation in Indian Courts

Methods for Legal Citation Prediction in the Age of LLMs: An Australian Law Case Study