Abstract:Upcoming imaging surveys will allow for high signal-to-noise measurements of galaxy clustering at small scales. In this work, we present the results of the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) bias challenge, the goal of which is to compare the performance of different nonlinear galaxy bias models in the context of LSST Year 10 (Y10) data. Specifically, we compare two perturbative approaches, Lagrangian perturbation theory (LPT) and Eulerian perturbation theory (EPT) to two variants of Hybrid Effective Field Theory (HEFT), with our fiducial implementation of these models including terms up to second order in the bias expansion as well as nonlocal bias and deviations from Poissonian stochasticity. We consider a variety of different simulated galaxy samples and test the performance of the bias models in a tomographic joint analysis of LSST-Y10-like galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy-lensing and cosmic shear. We find both HEFT methods as well as LPT and EPT combined with non-perturbative predictions for the matter power spectrum to yield unbiased constraints on cosmological parameters up to at least a maximal scale of k max = 0.4 Mpc -1 for all samples considered, even in the presence of assembly bias. While we find that we can reduce the complexity of the bias model for HEFT without compromising fit accuracy, this is not generally the case for the perturbative models. We find significant detections of non-Poissonian stochasticity in all cases considered, and our analysis shows evidence that small-scale galaxy clustering predominantly improves constraints on galaxy bias rather than cosmological parameters. These results therefore suggest that the systematic uncertainties associated with current nonlinear bias models are likely to be subdominant compared to other sources of error for tomographic analyses of upcoming photometric surveys, which bodes well for future galaxy clustering analyses using these high signal-to-noise data.

Simulation-Based Inference Benchmark for LSST Weak Lensing Cosmology

A simulation-based inference pipeline for cosmic shear with the Kilo-Degree Survey

KiDS-SBI: Simulation-Based Inference Analysis of KiDS-1000 Cosmic Shear

Optimal Neural Summarisation for Full-Field Weak Lensing Cosmological Implicit Inference

SimBIG: Field-level Simulation-Based Inference of Galaxy Clustering

Field-level simulation-based inference of galaxy clustering with convolutional neural networks

Forecasting the power of Higher Order Weak Lensing Statistics with automatically differentiable simulations

Constraining Cosmology with Simulation-based inference and Optical Galaxy Cluster Abundance

Population-level Dark Energy Constraints from Strong Gravitational Lensing using Simulation-Based Inference

Exploring the likelihood of the 21-cm power spectrum with simulation-based inference

A Strong Gravitational Lens Is Worth a Thousand Dark Matter Halos: Inference on Small-Scale Structure Using Sequential Methods

Galaxy bias in the era of LSST: perturbative bias expansions

EFTofLSS meets simulation-based inference: σ 8 from biased tracers

Monte Carlo Techniques for Addressing Large Errors and Missing Data in Simulation-based Inference

The DESI-Lensing Mock Challenge: large-scale cosmological analysis of 3x2-pt statistics

SBI++: Flexible, Ultra-fast Likelihood-free Inference Customized for Astronomical Applications

Simulation-based inference of deep fields: galaxy population model and redshift distributions

Exploiting the diversity of modeling methods to probe systematic biases in strong lensing analyses

Cosmological Analysis with Calibrated Neural Quantile Estimation and Approximate Simulators