Abstract:Recent works of Roughgarden (EC'21) and Chung and Shi (SODA'23) initiate the study of a new decentralized mechanism design problem called transaction fee mechanism design (TFM). Unlike the classical mechanism design literature, in the decentralized environment, even the auctioneer (i.e., the miner) can be a strategic player, and it can even collude with a subset of the users facilitated by binding side contracts. Chung and Shi showed two main impossibility results that rule out the existence of a {\it dream} TFM. First, any TFM that provides incentive compatibility for individual users and miner-user coalitions must always have zero miner revenue, no matter whether the block size is finite or infinite. Second, assuming finite block size, no non-trivial TFM can simultaenously provide incentive compatibility for any individual user, and for any miner-user coalition. In this work, we explore what new models and meaningful relaxations can allow us to circumvent the impossibility results of Chung and Shi. Besides today's model that does not employ cryptography, we introduce a new MPC-assisted model where the TFM is implemented by a joint multi-party computation (MPC) protocol among the miners. We prove several feasibility and infeasibility results for achieving {\it strict} and {\it approximate} incentive compatibility, respectively, in the plain model as well as the MPC-assisted model. We show that while cryptography is not a panacea, it indeed allows us to overcome some impossibility results pertaining to the plain model, leading to non-trivial mechanisms with useful guarantees that are otherwise impossible in the plain model. Our work is also the first to characterize the mathematical landscape of transaction fee mechanism design under approximate incentive compatibility, as well as in a cryptography-assisted model.

Stackelberg Attack on Protocol Fee Governance

Stackelberg Attacks on Auctions and Blockchain Transaction Fee Mechanisms

Fee-Redistribution Smart Contracts for Transaction-Fee-Based Regime of Blockchains with the Longest Chain Rule

The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making

The Cost of Permissionless Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers

Why Stake When You Can Borrow?

Arbitrageurs' profits, LVR, and sandwich attacks: batch trading as an AMM design response

Pathway: a protocol for algorithmic pricing of a DAO governance token

Breaking the Balance of Power: Commitment Attacks on Ethereum's Reward Mechanism

A theoretical framework for dynamical fee choice in AMMs

Role of fee choice in revenue generation of AMMs: A quantitative study

Improving DeFi Mechanisms with Dynamic Games and Optimal Control: A Case Study in Stablecoins

Transaction fee mechanism for Proof-of-Stake protocol

Bribe & Fork: Cheap Bribing Attacks via Forking Threat

Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance

Game-Theoretic Analysis of (Non-)Refundable Fees in the Lightning Network

Proof of Efficient Liquidity: A Staking Mechanism for Capital Efficient Liquidity

What Can Cryptography Do For Decentralized Mechanism Design

Automated Market Making and Arbitrage Profits in the Presence of Fees

Liquid Staking Tokens in Automated Market Makers

Game Theoretic Liquidity Provisioning in Concentrated Liquidity Market Makers