Estimating The Carbon Footprint Of Digital Agriculture Deployment: A Parametric Bottom-Up Modelling Approach

Pierre La Rocca,Gaël Guennebaud,Aurélie Bugeau,Anne-Laure Ligozat
2024-09-26
Abstract:Digitalization appears as a lever to enhance agriculture sustainability. However, existing works on digital agriculture's own sustainability remain scarce, disregarding the environmental effects of deploying digital devices on a large-scale. We propose a bottom-up method to estimate the carbon footprint of digital agriculture scenarios considering deployment of devices over a diversity of farm sizes. It is applied to two use-cases and demonstrates that digital agriculture encompasses a diversity of devices with heterogeneous carbon footprints and that more complex devices yield higher footprints not always compensated by better performances or scaling gains. By emphasizing the necessity of considering the multiplicity of devices, and the territorial distribution of farm sizes when modelling digital agriculture deployments, this study highlights the need for further exploration of the first-order effects of digital technologies in agriculture.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the carbon footprint of large - scale deployment of digital agricultural devices. Specifically, the author proposes a bottom - up approach to estimate the carbon footprint in digital agricultural scenarios by considering the device deployment situations under different farm scales. The focuses of the research are as follows: 1. **Evaluating the carbon footprint of digital agricultural devices**: There are few existing studies on the sustainability of digital agriculture, especially in terms of environmental impacts, particularly in the case of large - scale device deployment. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap and provide a systematic method to evaluate the carbon footprint of these devices. 2. **Considering device diversity**: Digital agriculture encompasses a variety of devices with different carbon footprints. The research emphasizes the need to consider device diversity and the geographical distribution of farm scales when modeling digital agriculture deployments. 3. **Exploring the impact of technical complexity**: The study finds that more complex devices usually generate a higher carbon footprint, but this increase is not always compensated by better performance or economies of scale. Therefore, the study explores the specific impact of devices with different technical complexities on the carbon footprint during large - scale deployment. 4. **Providing decision - support**: By comparing the carbon footprints of different deployment schemes, the study provides important reference information for policymakers and agricultural practitioners, helping them better consider the environmental impacts while promoting the development of digital agriculture. ### Main methods and results - **Methods**: - **Bottom - up modeling method**: The study uses a parameterized inventory procedure and a simplified life - cycle assessment method to estimate the carbon footprint in the manufacturing and use stages of devices. - **Case analysis**: The study selects two use cases for verification, namely the individual identification and estrus detection tasks in dairy farms, and the sowing and weeding robots in grain farms. - **Results**: - **Dairy farm use case**: As the technical complexity increases, the GHG emissions also increase accordingly. The manufacturing stage of laptops has the greatest impact on GHG emissions, followed by continuously operating cameras and antennas. - **Grain farm use case**: Although the power consumption increases with the increase in technical complexity and speed, in the case of a low - carbon electricity mix, the total GHG emissions are more related to the number of deployed devices and the carbon footprint in the manufacturing stage. The intermediate - level robot system (SS IR), due to its higher processing capacity, reduces the number of deployed devices and thus becomes the system with the least impact. ### Conclusion This study systematically evaluates the carbon footprint of large - scale deployment of digital agricultural devices by proposing a bottom - up method, emphasizing the importance of device diversity and technical complexity on environmental impacts. The research results provide valuable references for policymakers and agricultural practitioners, helping them better balance the relationship between technology and the environment while promoting the development of digital agriculture.