Abstract:One of the central goals of causal machine learning is the accurate estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects from observational data. In recent years, meta-learning has emerged as a flexible, model-agnostic paradigm for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) using any supervised model. This paper examines the performance of meta-learners when the confounding variables are expressed in text. Through synthetic data experiments, we show that learners using pre-trained text representations of confounders, in addition to tabular background variables, achieve improved CATE estimates compared to those relying solely on the tabular variables, particularly when sufficient data is available. However, due to the entangled nature of the text embeddings, these models do not fully match the performance of meta-learners with perfect confounder knowledge. These findings highlight both the potential and the limitations of pre-trained text representations for causal inference and open up interesting avenues for future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problem of how to use meta - learning methods to accurately estimate Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) when dealing with confounding variables in text form. Specifically, the researchers explored whether pre - trained text representations can improve the accuracy of CATE estimation when confounding variables are expressed in text form, and compared it with the situations of fully knowing or not knowing the confounding variables at all. Through this research, the author hopes to reveal the potential and limitations of pre - trained text representations in causal inference and provide directions for future research.
### Core issues of the paper
1. **The impact of confounding variables in text form on CATE estimation**:
- How does the meta - learner perform when confounding variables exist in text form?
- Can pre - trained text representations improve the accuracy of CATE estimation without fully knowing the confounding variables?
2. **Performance differences under different amounts of data**:
- How does the performance of the meta - learner change under different amounts of training data?
- Is there a data volume threshold at which pre - trained text representations can significantly improve the accuracy of CATE estimation?
### Experimental design
- **Experimental settings**:
- **Perfect knowledge**: Assume full knowledge of confounding variables in text form.
- **No knowledge**: Have no knowledge of confounding variables at all and only rely on structured background variables.
- **Pre - trained text representation**: Use pre - trained BioLord and MPNet embeddings to represent confounding variables.
- **Dataset**:
- Use the SynSUM synthetic dataset, which contains structured table variables and unstructured clinical text notes.
- **Evaluation metrics**:
- Use Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), that is, Precision in Estimation of Heterogeneous Effects (PEHE), to evaluate the accuracy of CATE estimation.
### Main findings
1. **The influence of data volume**:
- When the amount of training data is small, the effect of pre - trained text representations is similar to that of relying only on structured background variables.
- As the amount of training data increases, the effect of pre - trained text representations gradually improves, but it is still not as good as the situation of fully knowing the confounding variables.
2. **The effectiveness of pre - trained text representations**:
- Pre - trained text representations (whether BioLord or MPNet) do not reduce the performance of the model, even when the amount of data is small.
- When the amount of data is large, pre - trained text representations can partially make up for the lack of knowledge of confounding variables, but the effect is still not as good as fully knowing the confounding variables.
3. **The limitations of text representations**:
- The effect of pre - trained text representations is limited by the complexity of their embeddings and the distribution of confounding information, which may lead to incomplete extraction of information.
### Conclusions and future work
- **Conclusions**:
- Pre - trained text representations can improve the accuracy of CATE estimation to a certain extent when dealing with confounding variables in text form, especially when the amount of data is large.
- However, these representations still cannot completely replace full knowledge of confounding variables, mainly due to the complexity of text embeddings and the dispersion of information.
- **Future work**:
- Explore how to disentangle confounding information in text embeddings through supervised learning or other methods.
- Theoretically study the impact of representation errors on CATE estimation.
- Explore the impact of confounding variables in other modalities (such as images) on CATE estimation.
Through these studies, the author hopes to provide new ideas and directions for future causal inference and meta - learning methods.