Abstract:Highlights • The performance of identification algorithms is susceptible to many factors. • Head rotation beyond a 15-degree angle pose challenges to automated systems. • An upward tilt of 10° and higher leads to a notable degradation in performance. • Only a smiling face produced consistently positive log-likelihood ratios. • There is evidence of sex-related bias favoring males in image processing. In today's biometric and commercial settings, state-of-the-art image processing relies solely on artificial intelligence and machine learning which provides a high level of accuracy. However, these principles are deeply rooted in abstract, complex "black-box systems". When applied to forensic image identification, concerns about transparency and accountability emerge. This study explores the impact of two challenging factors in automated facial identification: facial expressions and head poses. The sample comprised 3D faces with nine prototype expressions, collected from 41 participants (13 males, 28 females) of European descent aged 19.96 to 50.89 years. Pre-processing involved converting 3D models to 2D color images (256 × 256 px). Probes included a set of 9 images per individual with head poses varying by 5° in both left-to-right (yaw) and up-and-down (pitch) directions for neutral expressions. A second set of 3,610 images per individual covered viewpoints in 5° increments from −45° to 45° for head movements and different facial expressions, forming the targets. Pair-wise comparisons using ArcFace, a state-of-the-art face identification algorithm yielded 54,615,690 dissimilarity scores. Results indicate that minor head deviations in probes have minimal impact. However, the performance diminished as targets deviated from the frontal position. Right-to-left movements were less influential than up and down, with downward pitch showing less impact than upward movements. The lowest accuracy was for upward pitch at 45°. Dissimilarity scores were consistently higher for males than for females across all studied factors. The performance particularly diverged in upward movements, starting at 15. Among tested facial expressions, happiness and contempt performed best, while disgust exhibited the lowest AUC values.

Revealing an Unattractivity Bias in Mental Reconstruction of Occluded Faces using Generative Image Models

OFER: Occluded Face Expression Reconstruction

Reconstructing Recognizable 3D Face Shapes Based on 3D Morphable Models.

Physically attractive faces attract us physically

Beauty-in-averageness and its contextual modulations: A Bayesian statistical account

A New Hypothesis on Facial Beauty Perception.

The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study

Benchmarking Algorithmic Bias in Face Recognition: An Experimental Approach Using Synthetic Faces and Human Evaluation

Identity-Expression Ambiguity in 3D Morphable Face Models

Learning a face space for experiments on human identity

(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distance

Head poses and grimaces: Challenges for automated face identification algorithms?

Neural Photofit: Gaze-based Mental Image Reconstruction

Subjectivity and complexity of facial attractiveness

A Comparative Study on the Perceived Attractiveness of Oriental and South Asian Faces

When being unattractive is an advantage: effects of face perception on intuitive culpability judgments

Facial misfits accelerate stereotype-based associative learning

A reflection on faces seen under mirror reversal

Image Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis for Detecting Unintended Bias

Predicting Facial Attractiveness from Colour Cues: A New Analytic Framework

Generating Diverse 3D Reconstructions from a Single Occluded Face Image