Abstract:Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems using pretrained large language models (LLMs). In this work, we analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity. To this end, we introduce a multi-step latent variable model that encapsulates the reasoning process, where the latent variable encodes the task information. Under this framework, we demonstrate that when the pretraining dataset is sufficiently large, the estimator formed by CoT prompting is equivalent to a Bayesian estimator. This estimator effectively solves the multi-step reasoning problem by aggregating a posterior distribution inferred from the demonstration examples in the prompt. Moreover, we prove that the statistical error of the CoT estimator can be decomposed into two main components: (i) a prompting error, which arises from inferring the true task using CoT prompts, and (ii) the statistical error of the pretrained LLM. We establish that, under appropriate assumptions, the prompting error decays exponentially to zero as the number of demonstrations increases. Additionally, we explicitly characterize the approximation and generalization errors of the pretrained LLM. Notably, we construct a transformer model that approximates the target distribution of the multi-step reasoning problem with an error that decreases exponentially in the number of transformer blocks. Our analysis extends to other variants of CoT, including Self-Consistent CoT, Tree-of-Thought, and Selection-Inference, offering a broad perspective on the efficacy of these methods. We also provide numerical experiments to validate the theoretical findings.

Watch Your Steps: Observable and Modular Chains of Thought

Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planning

Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters

Self-Harmonized Chain of Thought

A Theoretical Understanding of Chain-of-Thought: Coherent Reasoning and Error-Aware Demonstration

Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods

Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models

Markov Chain of Thought for Efficient Mathematical Reasoning

Supervised Chain of Thought

How to think step-by-step: A mechanistic understanding of chain-of-thought reasoning

Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought can Reduce Performance on Tasks where Thinking Makes Humans Worse

Pattern-Aware Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models

Structured Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Code Generation

Tab-CoT: Zero-shot Tabular Chain of Thought

Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Under Streaming Batch: A Case Study

To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning

Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoning

Stress Testing Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models

Towards Better Chain-of-Thought Prompting Strategies: A Survey

A Hopfieldian View-based Interpretation for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Chain-of-Probe: Examing the Necessity and Accuracy of CoT Step-by-Step