A Gated Residual Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Mixtures of Experts

Hugo Inzirillo,Remi Genet
2024-09-24
Abstract:This paper introduces KAMoE, a novel Mixture of Experts (MoE) framework based on Gated Residual Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (GRKAN). We propose GRKAN as an alternative to the traditional gating function, aiming to enhance efficiency and interpretability in MoE modeling. Through extensive experiments on digital asset markets and real estate valuation, we demonstrate that KAMoE consistently outperforms traditional MoE architectures across various tasks and model types. Our results show that GRKAN exhibits superior performance compared to standard Gating Residual Networks, particularly in LSTM-based models for sequential tasks. We also provide insights into the trade-offs between model complexity and performance gains in MoE and KAMoE architectures.
Machine Learning,Neural and Evolutionary Computing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to improve the efficiency and interpretability of the Mixture of Experts (MoE) model when dealing with complex tasks such as financial market trading volume prediction and real - estate valuation. Specifically, the author introduced a new MoE framework - KAMoE based on Gated Residual Kolmogorov - Arnold Networks (GRKAN), aiming to enhance the model performance by improving the traditional gating mechanism. ### Main problems and solutions 1. **Improving the efficiency and interpretability of the MoE model**: - The gating function in the traditional MoE model may not be efficient or interpretable enough in some cases. To solve this problem, the author proposed using GRKAN to replace the traditional gating mechanism. - GRKAN combines the advantages of the Kolmogorov - Arnold Network (KAN) and the residual network, and can estimate the weights of each expert network more accurately, thereby improving the overall model performance. 2. **Enhancing performance on specific tasks**: - The author verified the effectiveness of the KAMoE framework through extensive experiments on tasks such as the digital asset market and real - estate valuation. The experimental results show that KAMoE outperforms the traditional MoE architecture in multiple tasks and model types. - In particular, in the LSTM - based model, GRKAN shows better performance than the standard gated residual network. 3. **Exploring the trade - off between model complexity and performance**: - The paper also explored the impact of increasing model complexity on performance in MoE and KAMoE architectures. Although these architectures can significantly improve performance, they also increase computational complexity and resource requirements, so a careful trade - off is required. ### Formula representation To better understand the working principle of the model, the following are some key formulas involved in the paper: - **Input transformation**: \[ \tilde{x}_i = W_{\tilde{x}_i}\odot X_i \] where \(W_{\tilde{x}_i}\in\mathbb{R}^{\text{dim}(X)}\), and \(\odot\) represents the Hadamard product. - **GRKAN gating mechanism**: \[ \omega(x)=\text{LayerNorm}(x + \text{GLU}_\omega(\eta_1)) \] \[ \eta_1=\text{KAN}(\varphi_{\eta_1}(.),\eta_2) \] \[ \eta_2=\text{KAN}(\varphi_{\eta_2}(.),x) \] where \(\varphi_{\eta_1}\) and \(\varphi_{\eta_2}\) are the activation functions of the KAN layer respectively, and SiLU and ELU are used here. - **Expert output**: \[ \tilde{y}_{i,k}=f_{k,\theta_k}(\tilde{x}_i) \] - **Global output**: \[ \hat{y}_i=\sum_{k = 1}^{m}a_{i,k}f_{k,\theta_k}(x)=\sum_{k = 1}^{m}a_{i,k}\tilde{y}_{i,k} \] where \(a_{i,k}=\sigma(\Xi(z_i))\) is the weight calculated through GRKAN. Through these improvements, the KAMoE framework not only improves the performance of the MoE model but also shows its wide applicability and superiority in different types of tasks.