Pair size and quantum geometry in a multiband Hubbard model

M. Iskin

2024-09-23

Abstract:We study the size of two-body bound states and Cooper pairs within a multiband Hubbard model that features time-reversal symmetry and uniform pairing on a generic lattice. Our analysis involves (i) an exact calculation of the localization tensor to determine the size of lowest-lying two-body bound state in vacuum, and (ii) an evaluation of the average size of Cooper pairs using mean-field BCS-BEC crossover theory at zero temperature. Beyond the conventional intraband contribution that depends on Bloch bands, we show that pair size also has a geometric contribution governed by the quantum-metric tensor of the Bloch states and their band-resolved quantum-metric tensors. As a concrete example, we investigate the pyrochlore-Hubbard model numerically and demonstrate that, while the pair size diverges in the weakly interacting BCS regime, it remains finite and relatively small in the flat-band regime, even for infinitesimal interaction, perfectly matching the exact two-body result in the dilute limit.

Superconductivity,Quantum Gases,Strongly Correlated Electrons

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how quantum geometry affects the size of two - body bound states and Cooper pairs in the multi - band Hubbard model. Specifically, the author has conducted research in the following two aspects:

1. **Exact calculation of the localization tensor**: Determine the size of the two - body bound state at the lowest energy level in vacuum. This involves the exact calculation of the localization tensor to quantify the spatial extent of the bound state.

2. **Evaluation of the average Cooper pair size**: Use the mean - field BCS - BEC crossover theory at zero temperature to evaluate the average size of Cooper pairs. This takes into account not only the traditional intra - band contributions (depending on the Bloch band), but also the geometric contributions determined by the Bloch states and their band - decomposed quantum metric tensors.

### Main findings
- **Comparison between BCS and flat - band regions**:
- In the weakly interacting BCS region, the size of Cooper pairs diverges as the interaction strength decreases.
- In the flat - band region, even under a tiny interaction, the size of Cooper pairs remains finite and relatively small, which perfectly matches the exact result of the two - body bound state in vacuum in the dilute limit.

- **Difference between pairing size and coherence length**:
- Although the pairing size and the coherence length are related, they are different physical quantities with different quantum - geometric origins.
- The coherence length is related to the motion of Cooper pairs and is described by the inverse effective mass tensor; while the pairing size does not directly depend on the center - of - mass momentum of Cooper pairs.

### Numerical calculation example
- **Pyrochlore Hubbard model**: The author has studied the pyrochlore Hubbard model through numerical calculations, showing that in the weakly interacting BCS region, the size of Cooper pairs diverges, while in the flat - band region, the size of Cooper pairs remains finite and small.

### Conclusion
- By analyzing the quantum - geometric effects in the multi - band Hubbard model, the author has revealed the differences in the behavior of the pairing size under different interaction strengths. In particular, the finiteness of the pairing size in the flat - band region indicates that quantum geometry plays a crucial role in superconducting pairing.

### Formula summary
- **Localization tensor**:
\[
(\xi^2_{2b})_{ij} = \sum_{i'S'} \bar{r}_i \bar{r}_j |\psi_q^{SS'}(\bar{r})|^2
\]
where \(\bar{r} = r_1 - r_2\) is the relative position of the two particles.

- **Average Cooper pair size**:
\[
(\xi^2_{Cp})_{ij} = \sum_{r_1 r_2} r_i r_j |\Phi(r_1, r_2)|^2
\]

- **Intra - band and inter - band contributions**:
- Intra - band contribution:
\[
(\xi^2_{2b})_{\text{intra}, ij} = \sum_{nk} \frac{\partial_i \alpha_{nnk} \partial_j (\alpha_{nnk})^*}{(2\varepsilon_{nk} - E_b)^4} \sum_{nk} \frac{1}{(2\varepsilon_{nk} - E_b)^2}
\]
- Inter - band contribution:
\[
(\xi^2_{2b})_{\text{inter}, ij} = \sum_{nk} \frac{g_{nk}^{ij}}{(2\varepsilon_{nk} - E_b)^2} - \sum_{n \neq m, k} \frac{g_{nmk}^{ij}}{(2\varepsilon_{nk} - E_b)(2\varepsilon_{mk} - E_b)} \sum_{nk} \frac{1}{(2\varepsilon_{nk} - E_b)^2}
\]

These formulas describe in detail the calculation method of the pairing size and show the role of quantum geometry in it.