Abstract:Addressing the challenge of toxic language in online discussions is crucial for the development of effective toxicity detection models. This pioneering work focuses on addressing imbalanced datasets in toxicity detection by introducing a novel approach to augment toxic language data. We create a balanced dataset by instructing fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) using Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Recognizing the challenges in collecting sufficient toxic samples from social media platforms for building a balanced dataset, our methodology involves sentence-level text data augmentation through paraphrasing existing samples using optimized generative LLMs. Leveraging generative LLM, we utilize the Proximal Policy Optimizer (PPO) as the RL algorithm to fine-tune the model further and align it with human feedback. In other words, we start by fine-tuning a LLM using an instruction dataset, specifically tailored for the task of paraphrasing while maintaining semantic consistency. Next, we apply PPO and a reward function, to further fine-tune (optimize) the instruction-tuned LLM. This RL process guides the model in generating toxic responses. We utilize the Google Perspective API as a toxicity evaluator to assess generated responses and assign rewards/penalties accordingly. This approach guides LLMs through PPO and the reward function, transforming minority class samples into augmented versions. The primary goal of our methodology is to create a balanced and diverse dataset to enhance the accuracy and performance of classifiers in identifying instances from the minority class. Utilizing two publicly available toxic datasets, we compared various techniques with our proposed method for generating toxic samples, demonstrating that our approach outperforms all others in producing a higher number of toxic samples. Starting with an initial 16,225 toxic prompts, our method successfully generated 122,951 toxic samples with a toxicity score exceeding 30%. Subsequently, we developed various classifiers using the generated balanced datasets and applied a cost-sensitive learning approach to the original imbalanced dataset. The findings highlight the superior performance of classifiers trained on data generated using our proposed method. These results highlight the importance of employing RL and a data-agnostic model as a reward mechanism for augmenting toxic data, thereby enhancing the robustness of toxicity detection models.

ToxiCraft: A Novel Framework for Synthetic Generation of Harmful Information

ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detection

Can Open-source LLMs Enhance Data Synthesis for Toxic Detection?: An Experimental Study

Facilitating Fine-grained Detection of Chinese Toxic Language: Hierarchical Taxonomy, Resources, and Benchmarks

ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversation

Towards Robust Toxic Content Classification

RECAST: Interactive Auditing of Automatic Toxicity Detection Models

LLM-Based Synthetic Datasets: Applications and Limitations in Toxicity Detection

Unveiling disguised toxicity: A novel pre-processing module for enhanced content moderation

Robust Conversational Agents against Imperceptible Toxicity Triggers

Mitigating Text Toxicity with Counterfactual Generation

ToXCL: A Unified Framework for Toxic Speech Detection and Explanation

AugmenToxic: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning to Optimize LLM Instruction Fine-Tuning for Data Augmentation to Enhance Toxicity Detection

ToVo: Toxicity Taxonomy via Voting

Simple Text Detoxification by Identifying a Linear Toxic Subspace in Language Model Embeddings

In-game Toxic Language Detection: Shared Task and Attention Residuals

RECAST: Enabling User Recourse and Interpretability of Toxicity Detection Models with Interactive Visualization

Just KIDDIN: Knowledge Infusion and Distillation for Detection of INdecent Memes

Detecting AI Flaws: Target-Driven Attacks on Internal Faults in Language Models

ToxiSpanSE: An Explainable Toxicity Detection in Code Review Comments

You Only Prompt Once: On the Capabilities of Prompt Learning on Large Language Models to Tackle Toxic Content