Running head : UNATTENDED PRIMING OF MOTIVATION Priming Motivation Through Unattended Speech
Rémi Radel,P. Sarrazin,Marie Jehu,L. Pelletier
Abstract:This paper examines whether motivation can be primed through unattended speech. Study 1 tested this question using a dichotic listening paradigm and repeated strength measures. In comparison to the baseline condition, in which the unattended channel was only composed by neutral words, the presence of words related to high (low) intensity of motivation led participants to exert more (less) strength when squeezing a hand dynamometer. A second study provided a more realistic procedure. Participants could hear a barely audible conversation while focusing on a demanding task. Participants who were exposed to a conversation depicting intrinsic motivation performed better and persevered longer in a subsequent word fragment-completion task than those who were exposed to the same conversation made unintelligible. These findings indicate that motivation can be primed through the auditory modality even when attentional capacities are occupied. keywords: motivation ; attention ; priming ; speech perception. AUDITORY PRIMING OF MOTIVATION 2 Priming Motivation through Unattended Speech Although the belief that motivation can originate from factors outside of the person’s conscious control has existed for decades (Freud, 1920/1981; Maslow, 1948; McClelland, 1985), the lack of scientific evidence has led motivational theorists to propose models based only on reflective or controlled determinants of the action (e.g., Ajzen, 1991; Bandura, 1986; Locke & Latham, 1990). However, numerous recent studies on this topic have yielded indisputable evidence that motivation can be the result of automatic processing as well (see Custers & Aarts, 2010 for a review). But while an automatic process is not only characterized by its enfranchisement from consciousness (Bargh, 1994), this only characteristic has been investigated in the research on automatic processing of motivation. The aim of this paper is to examine if motivation could also be primed outside of the attentional focus. Automatic Activation of Motivation As suggested by Weiner’s “god-like” metaphor (1992), the most influential motivational theories traditionally assumed that humans were all knowing, aware of their goals, and deliberated on their motivational state after thoughtful reflection on the costs and benefits of their actions. Since then, this idea has been challenged, and many studies have come to suggest that motivation could also result from automatic processes. For doing so, these studies have used a priming paradigm to show that motivational states can be activated outside of individuals’ conscious awareness. Typically, these studies used a first task to prime the motivational state, then examined if participants’ motivation was really affected by assessing several behavioral indices in a second task. The first study of this nature was conducted by Bargh and his colleagues (Bargh, Gollwitzer, Lee-Chai, Barndollar, & Troetschel, 2001) who primed the goal to achieve AUDITORY PRIMING OF MOTIVATION 3 using a scrambled sentence task. The participants who were exposed to words related to achievement during the scrambled sentence task (e.g. win or perform), performed better and persevered more in a second puzzle than those who were only exposed to neutral words. The goal to achieve was actually activated in the participants, as these outcomes are the typical consequences of the endorsement of this goal. Importantly, participants reported during the debriefing that the first task had no effect on their performance in the second task. Further studies have widely replicated goal priming effect using different methods of priming such as exposure to subliminal visual stimuli (e.g., Mitchell, Macrae, Schooler, Rowe, & Milne, 2003), exposure to subtle environmental cues (e.g., Holland, Hendriks, & Aarts, 2005), the perception of others’ goals (e.g., Aarts, Hassin, & Gollwitzer, 2004) and using different kinds of goals such as helping (Macrae & Johnston, 1998), cleaning (Holland et al., 2005), memorizing (Mitchell et al., 2003), flirting or making money (Aarts et al., 2004). It should be noted that motivation priming is not simply limited to goals, since general motivational orientations such as extrinsic (i.e., doing an activity for separable consequences) versus intrinsic motivation (IM) (i.e., doing an activity for itself and the pleasure of doing it) have also been primed (e.g., Lévesque & Pelletier, 2003; Radel, Sarrazin, Legrain, & Gobancé, 2009a; Radel, Sarrazin, & Pelletier, 2009b). For example, Radel et al. (2009b) demonstrated that when students were exposed to subliminal words related to IM (e.g., choice, interest) during a first cognitive task, they exerted more effort, persevered longer and performed better in learning a subsequent motor task than those who were primed with words related to extrinsic motivation (e.g., constraint, duty). To rule out any hypotheses of conscious processing, a few recent studies have included an improved control measure of awareness consisting in an objective test (e.g., a 2-alternatives forced choice task) performed systematically trial after trial. Even when participants were AUDITORY PRIMING OF MOTIVATION 4 objectively unaware of the primes, a motivation priming effect was still reported. For example, in the study by Aarts, Custer, and Marien (2008), the participants who were subliminally exposed to words related to a high intensity of motivation (e.g. vigorous) exerted more strength in squeezing a handgrip than participants who were not exposed to any subliminal words. It should be noted that an effect of unconscious motivation has even been imaged using fMRI (Pessiglione et al., 2007). In conclusion, there is now ample evidence to support the fact that individuals’ motivational state can result from automatic processing. However, as noted earlier, we only know that motivation can be activated outside of consciousness, while automatic processing can also be characterized by absence of intentionality, effort, and attention (Bargh, 1994; Schiffrin & Schneider, 1977). For example, it is impossible to say if motivation could be primed in the absence of attention. This paper addressed this question by investigating if motivational cues embedded in unattended speech can prime the corresponding motivation. Unattended Speech Processing Since the first dichotic listening experiments by Cherry (1953), it has turned to be crucial to determine whether or not unattended speech is processed for designing models of attention and information processing (e.g., Broadbent, 1958; Deutsch & Deutsch, 1963; Treisman, 1964; Posner, 1990). Research on the processing of unattended speech has stuck to the dichotic listening paradigm. In this paradigm, a different message is presented in each ear. Participants are asked to perform a demanding task with stimuli presented in one channel, while ignoring the other. The first support for unattended speech processing was provided by Moray (1959), who reported that participants are sometimes able to notice their name in an unattended channel of speech. This finding has been replicated by Wood and Cowan (1995a) who have also found that AUDITORY PRIMING OF MOTIVATION 5 name detection led to a decrease in performance in the attended channel. Eich (1984) also provided support to the processing of unattended speech by using a priming procedure. While participants performed a shadowing task on the attended channel, a homophone and a word related to its less frequent meaning were presented in the unattended channel. Although participants were not able to recall the word pairs, they were more likely to give the homophone with the less frequent meaning when asked to spell it. This was congruent with results from the event related potential study by Bentin, Kutas, and Hillyard (1995), which indicated that while both attended and unattended words were semantically processed, attended words form traces that were subsequently more available to conscious recollection than unattended words. Nevertheless, as reviewed by Holender (1986) and by Dupoux, Kouider, and Mehler (2003), the material used in all of these studies could have increased the likelihood of attentional switches. First, the unattended channel was comprised of isolated words that could easily capture attention (Holender, 1986). Second, the presentation rate of the stimuli in the attended channel was often slow, which likely caused attention to wander. As a result, a momentary attentional switch could occur and could lead participants to pick up some semantic information from the unattended channel. This might explain apparent results of unattended speech processing. Newstead and Dennis (1979) used continuous speech instead of isolated words in the unattended channel. By using this technique, the unattended speech had no influence on participants’ interpretations of ambiguous sentences. In regards to the presentation rate of unattended stimuli, Wood, Stadler, and Cowan (1997) replicated Eich’s (1984) implicit priming results using the same shadowing rate, but failed to replicate his findings with a faster rate. In a set of studies using repetition priming, Dupoux et al. (2003) manipulated features of the unattended prime words and examined the response time to make a lexical decision on a AUDITORY PRIMING OF MOTIVATION 6 target. In all of their studies, words were presented at a high rate in the attended channel, unattended speech was time compressed and was played 12 dB below the attended speech in order to reduce the probability of attentional switches. When the prime was embedded in a stream of speech with similar auditory properties, no priming effect was found. In addition, in situations where priming effects were found (e.g., isolated words in the unattended channel), most of the participants were aware of the presence of the prime. While the processing of unattended speech was thought to be the result of a lack of control over attentional switches, a recent set o