Abstract:The abilities to predict, explain, and control might arise out of operations on a common underlying representation or, conversely, from independent cognitive processes. We developed a novel experimental paradigm to explore how individuals might use probabilistic mental models in these three tasks, under varying levels of complexity and uncertainty. Participants interacted with a simple chatbot defined by a finite-state machine, and were then tested on their ability to predict, explain, and control the chatbot's responses. When full information was available, performance varied significantly across the tasks, with control proving most robust to increased complexity, and explanation being the most challenging. In the presence of hidden information, however, performance across tasks equalized, and participants demonstrated an alternative neglect bias, i.e., a tendency to ignore less likely possibilities. A second, within-subject experimental design then looked for correlations between abilities. We did not find strong correlations, but the challenges of the task for the subjects limited our statistical power. To understand these effects better, a final experiment investigated the possibility of cross-training, skill transfer, or "zero-shot" performance: how well a participant, explicitly trained on one of the three tasks, could perform on the others without additional training. Here we found strong asymmetries: participants trained to control gained generalizable abilities to both predict and explain, while training on either prediction or explanation did not lead to transfer. This cross-training experiment also revealed correlations in performance; most notably between control and prediction. Our findings highlight the complex role of mental models, in contrast to task-specific heuristics, when information is partially hidden, and suggest new avenues for research into situations where the acquisition of general purpose mental models may provide a unifying explanation for a variety of cognitive abilities.

Using High-Level Patterns to Estimate How Humans Predict a Robot will Behave

Guessing human intentions to avoid dangerous situations in caregiving robots

Drivers' Manoeuvre Modelling and Prediction for Safe HRI

Analyzing Human Models that Adapt Online

Dynamically Switching Human Prediction Models for Efficient Planning

Spatially Small-scale Approach-avoidance Behaviors Allow Learning-free Machine Inference of Object Preferences in Human Minds

Towards Modeling and Influencing the Dynamics of Human Learning

RILI: Robustly Influencing Latent Intent

Learning Latent Representations to Co-Adapt to Humans

Teaching Robots to Predict Human Motion

Towards Proactive Safe Human-Robot Collaborations via Data-Efficient Conditional Behavior Prediction

An Analysis of Human-Robot Information Streams to Inform Dynamic Autonomy Allocation

A human-aware control paradigm for human-robot interactions, a simulation study

When Humans Aren't Optimal: Robots that Collaborate with Risk-Aware Humans

Robots that Take Advantage of Human Trust

Models of human behavior for human-robot interaction and automated driving: How accurate do the models of human behavior need to be?

Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments

Personalizing Interfaces to Humans with User-Friendly Priors

Learning Multimodal Latent Dynamics for Human-Robot Interaction

A Deconfounding Framework for Human Behavior Prediction: Enhancing Robotic Systems in Dynamic Environments

Risk-Calibrated Human-Robot Interaction via Set-Valued Intent Prediction