Abstract:Context . The cosmological concordance model (ΛCDM) is the current standard model in cosmology thanks to its ability to reproduce the observations. The first observational evidence for this model appeared roughly 20 years ago from the type-Ia supernovae (SNIa) Hubble diagram from two different groups. However, there has been some debate in the literature concerning the statistical treatment of SNIa, and their stature as proof of cosmic acceleration. Aims . In this paper we relax the standard assumption that SNIa intrinsic luminosity is independent of redshift, and examine whether it may have an impact on our cosmological knowledge and more precisely on the accelerated nature of the expansion of the universe. Methods . To maximise the scope of this study, we do not specify a given cosmological model, but we reconstruct the expansion rate of the universe through a cubic spline interpolation fitting the observations of the different cosmological probes: SNIa, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and the high-redshift information from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Results . We show that when SNIa intrinsic luminosity is not allowed to vary as a function of redshift, cosmic acceleration is definitely proven in a model-independent approach. However, allowing for redshift dependence, a nonaccelerated reconstruction of the expansion rate is able to fit, at the same level of ΛCDM, the combination of SNIa and BAO data, both treating the BAO standard ruler r d as a free parameter (not entering on the physics governing the BAO), and adding the recently published prior from CMB observations. We further extend the analysis by including the CMB data. In this case we also consider a third way to combine the different probes by explicitly computing r d from the physics of the early universe, and we show that a nonaccelerated reconstruction is able to nicely fit this combination of low- and high-redshift data. We also check that this reconstruction is compatible with the latest measurements of the growth rate of matter perturbations. We finally show that the value of the Hubble constant ( H 0 ) predicted by this reconstruction is in tension with model-independent measurements. Conclusions . We present a model-independent reconstruction of a nonaccelerated expansion rate of the universe that is able to fit all the main background cosmological probes nicely. However, the predicted value of H 0 is in tension with recent direct measurements. Our analysis points out that a final reliable and consensual value for H 0 is critical to definitively prove cosmic acceleration in a model-independent way.

The model-independent evidence of cosmic acceleration revisited

The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints

Probing Cosmic Acceleration by Strong Gravitational Lensing Systems

Model independent constraints on the cosmological expansion rate

Constraining on the non-standard cosmological models combining the observations of high-redshift quasars and BAO

Model-independent cosmic acceleration and redshift-dependent intrinsic luminosity in type-Ia supernovae

A new $f(Q)$ cosmological model with $H(z)$ quadratic expansion

An improved model-independent assessment of the late-time cosmic expansion

Reaffirming the Cosmic Acceleration without Supernova and CMB

Narrowing down the possible explanations of cosmic acceleration with geometric probes

A new alternative model to dark energy

Exploring Late-Time Cosmic Acceleration with EoS Parameterizations in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity via Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

Test $Λ$CDM model with High Redshift data from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

A class of transient acceleration models consistent with Big Bang cosmology

The Acceleration History of the Universe and the Properties of the Dark Energy

A comprehensive investigation on the slowing down of cosmic acceleration

Modeling cosmic acceleration with a generalized varying deceleration parameter

Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data

Exploring Universe acceleration through observational constraints via Hubble parameter reconstruction

Is the present expansion of the universe really accelerating?