Abstract:Broad textual understanding and in-context learning require language models that utilize full document contexts. Due to the implementation challenges associated with directly training long-context models, many methods have been proposed for extending models to handle long contexts. However, owing to differences in data and model classes, it has been challenging to compare these approaches, leading to uncertainty as to how to evaluate long-context performance and whether it differs from standard evaluation. We implement a controlled protocol for extension methods with a standardized evaluation, utilizing consistent base models and extension data. Our study yields several insights into long-context behavior. First, we reaffirm the critical role of perplexity as a general-purpose performance indicator even in longer-context tasks. Second, we find that current approximate attention methods systematically underperform across long-context tasks. Finally, we confirm that exact fine-tuning based methods are generally effective within the range of their extension, whereas extrapolation remains challenging. All codebases, models, and checkpoints will be made available open-source, promoting transparency and facilitating further research in this critical area of AI development.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to address the challenges of Long Context Extension and generalization in Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, the paper focuses on the following core issues: 1. **Challenges in Implementing Long Context Processing**: - Directly training language models capable of handling long contexts presents technical implementation difficulties. Therefore, researchers have proposed various extension methods to enable existing short-context models to handle longer texts. - Different methods vary in terms of data and model types, making comparisons between these methods difficult. 2. **Uncertainty in Evaluation Methods**: - Due to the lack of unified evaluation standards, there is uncertainty in the current evaluation of long context performance. It is unclear whether these evaluations differ from standard evaluation methods. - Existing evaluation metrics (such as long context perplexity, retrieval accuracy, etc.) are difficult to calibrate across different methods, making fair comparisons challenging. 3. **Effectiveness of Long Context Extensions**: - It is necessary to determine which extension methods are most effective in practical applications, especially for different tasks and context lengths. - Evaluate the performance of current approximate attention methods and precise fine-tuning methods in long context tasks to understand their respective advantages and disadvantages. ### Solutions To systematically address the above issues, the paper proposes a control protocol to compare different long context extension methods through standardized evaluation methods. Specific measures include: 1. **Standardized Base Model**: - All experiments use the same baseline model (LLaMA2-7B) to eliminate the impact of different base models. 2. **Unified Extension Method Framework**: - Implemented various long context extension methods and used the same dataset and training process to ensure consistency and comparability of results. 3. **Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Metrics**: - Used intrinsic metrics (such as perplexity) and extrinsic metrics (such as downstream task performance) to comprehensively evaluate the model's performance. - Evaluated within the extension length and in longer contexts to test the model's generalization ability. ### Main Findings 1. **Importance of Perplexity**: - Perplexity remains a universal performance metric and performs well even in long context tasks. - Precise fine-tuning methods show a strong correlation between perplexity and downstream task performance in controlled studies. 2. **Limitations of Approximate Attention Methods**: - Current approximate attention methods perform poorly in most benchmarks. Although they can handle longer contexts, they often sacrifice accuracy. 3. **Effectiveness of Precise Fine-Tuning Methods**: - Precise fine-tuning methods (such as Dynamic NTK) perform well within the extension range, with the Dynamic NTK method performing the best among all methods. - Extrapolating to longer contexts remains a challenge and requires further research. ### Conclusion Through systematic controlled experiments, the paper provides new insights into the evaluation of long context extension methods, emphasizing the importance of precise attention mechanisms in maintaining high accuracy and pointing out directions for future research. All codes, models, and checkpoints have been open-sourced to promote transparency and further research.

A Controlled Study on Long Context Extension and Generalization in LLMs

LLM Maybe LongLM: Self-Extend LLM Context Window Without Tuning

L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Models

LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?

Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA

E^2-LLM: Efficient and Extreme Length Extension of Large Language Models

Empower Your Model with Longer and Better Context Comprehension

Systematic Evaluation of Long-Context LLMs on Financial Concepts

Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learning

How to Train Long-Context Language Models (Effectively)

Extending LLMs' Context Window with 100 Samples

Retrieval meets Long Context Large Language Models

Ada-LEval: Evaluating long-context LLMs with length-adaptable benchmarks

The What, Why, and How of Context Length Extension Techniques in Large Language Models -- A Detailed Survey

FltLM: An Intergrated Long-Context Large Language Model for Effective Context Filtering and Understanding

CLongEval: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Context Large Language Models

Large Language Models Can Self-Improve in Long-context Reasoning

Beyond the Limits: A Survey of Techniques to Extend the Context Length in Large Language Models

LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding

LongIns: A Challenging Long-context Instruction-based Exam for LLMs