Abstract:The rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), has revolutionized the landscape of lifelong learning. This paper introduces a conceptual framework for a self-constructed lifelong learning environment supported by LLMs. It highlights the inadequacies of traditional education systems in keeping pace with the rapid deactualization of knowledge and skills. The proposed framework emphasizes the transformation from institutionalized education to personalized, self-driven learning. It leverages the natural language capabilities of LLMs to provide dynamic and adaptive learning experiences, facilitating the creation of personal intellectual agents that assist in knowledge acquisition. The framework integrates principles of lifelong learning, including the necessity of building personal world models, the dual modes of learning (training and exploration), and the creation of reusable learning artifacts. Additionally, it underscores the importance of curiosity-driven learning and reflective practices in maintaining an effective learning trajectory. The paper envisions the evolution of educational institutions into "flipped" universities, focusing on supporting global knowledge consistency rather than merely structuring and transmitting knowledge.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the problem that the traditional education system cannot keep up in the rapidly changing knowledge and skills environment. Specifically, it focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Rapid obsolescence of knowledge and skills**: With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology (especially large - language models, LLMs), the update speed of knowledge and skills has accelerated, and the traditional one - time college education is no longer sufficient to meet the needs of lifelong career development. 2. **The need for personalized learning**: The traditional education system usually adopts a unified syllabus and method, and it is difficult to adapt to individual differences and personalized learning needs. The paper proposes the need for a more flexible and personalized lifelong learning environment to help learners learn according to their own career trajectories and interests. 3. **The transition from institutionalized education to self - directed learning**: The paper emphasizes the importance of the transition from the traditional institutionalized education model to a self - directed, self - constructed lifelong learning environment. This transition requires learners to be able to independently plan and manage their own learning processes and use modern technological tools (such as LLMs) to assist learning. 4. **Global knowledge consistency**: The paper also discusses how, through the concept of "flipped university", educational institutions can no longer be just knowledge transmitters, but become key players in supporting global knowledge consistency and evolution. ### Main contributions of the paper The paper proposes a conceptual framework for constructing a self - built lifelong learning environment supported by LLMs. This framework includes the following key principles and components: - **Construction of personal world models**: Learners should establish and continuously update their own knowledge systems. - **Dual - mode learning**: The learning process includes two modes: training (skill practice) and exploration (learning and adaptation of new concepts). - **Reusable learning artifacts**: Artifacts produced during the learning process (such as notes, code, conversation records, etc.) can be used as references for future learning. - **Curiosity - driven learning**: Learning should start from practical or open - ended problems to stimulate learners' exploration desires. - **Reflective practice**: Regularly reflect on the learning effect and adjust learning strategies and tools. - **Shared learning experiences**: Enrich personal knowledge systems by solving open - ended problems or participating in comprehensive games. Through these principles and components, the paper hopes to promote the development of the education system in a more flexible, personalized and self - directed direction to meet the needs of lifelong learning in modern society.

"Flipped" University: LLM-Assisted Lifelong Learning Environment

LLMs as Academic Reading Companions: Extending HCI Through Synthetic Personae

Student Perspectives on Using a Large Language Model (LLM) for an Assignment on Professional Ethics

Revolutionizing Higher Education: Unleashing the Potential of Large Language Models for Strategic Transformation

Innovative Method of Lifelong Learning in the Digital Environment

Prototyping the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for adult learning content creation at scale

LLMs in Education: Novel Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities

Evaluating the Impact of Advanced LLM Techniques on AI-Lecture Tutors for a Robotics Course

Large Language Model-Driven Classroom Flipping: Empowering Student-Centric Peer Questioning with Flipped Interaction

Leveraging the Potential of Large Language Models in Education Through Playful and Game-Based Learning

AI for Education (AI4EDU): Advancing Personalized Education with LLM and Adaptive Learning

Supporting Self-Reflection at Scale with Large Language Models: Insights from Randomized Field Experiments in Classrooms

Large Language Model-based Tools in Language Teaching to Develop Critical Thinking and Sustainable Cognitive Structures

LLMs Could Autonomously Learn Without External Supervision

Large Language Models Meet User Interfaces: The Case of Provisioning Feedback

Ethical Considerations for Companies Implementing LLMs in Education Software

Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLMs in Introductory Computer Science Education: A Semester-Long Field Study

Navigating LLM Ethics: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions

"The teachers are confused as well": A Multiple-Stakeholder Ethics Discussion on Large Language Models in Computing Education

Choosing Between an LLM versus Search for Learning: A HigherEd Student Perspective