Abstract:The brain-inspired Spiking neural networks (SNN) claim to present advantages for visual classification tasks in terms of energy efficiency and inherent robustness. In this work, we explore the impact on network inter-layer sparsity through neural coding schemes and the intrinsic structural parameters of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neurons, which can be a candidate metric for performance evaluation. Towards this, we perform a comparative study of four critical neural coding schemes: rate coding (poisson coding), latency coding, phase coding, and direct coding, as well as 6 LIF neuron intrinsic parameter options for a total of 24 combined parameter schemes. Specifically, the models were trained using a supervised training algorithm with a surrogate gradient, and two adversarial attacks, Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) were applied on a CIFAR10 dataset. We identified the sources of interlayer sparsity in SNN, and quantitatively analyzed the differences in sparsity caused by coding schemes, neuron leakage factors and thresholds. Various aspects of network performance were thoroughly considered in this paper, including inference accuracy, adversarial robustness, and energy efficiency. Our results show that latency coding is the optimum choice in achieving the highest adversarial robustness and energy efficient against low intensity attacks, while rate coding offers the best adversarial robustness against medium and high intensity attacks. The maximum deviations of robustness and efficiency between different coding schemes are 9.35% in VGG5 and 13.59% in VGG9. Increasing the sparsity of spike activity by improving the threshold can bring a short-lived adversarial robustness sweet spot, while excessive sparsity due to changes in threshold and leakage can instead reduce the adversarial robustness. The study reveals the advantages and disadvantages, and design space of SNN in various dimensions, allowing researchers to frame their neuromorphic systems in terms of the coding methods, neuron inherent structure, and model learning capabilities.

Are Sparse Neural Networks Better Hard Sample Learners?

Deep CovDenseSNN: A Hierarchical Event-Driven Dynamic Framework with Spiking Neurons in Noisy Environment

Efficient Spiking Neural Networks with Sparse Selective Activation for Continual Learning

SRS-DNN: a Deep Neural Network with Strengthening Response Sparsity

Ten Lessons We Have Learned in the New "Sparseland": A Short Handbook for Sparse Neural Network Researchers

Effective Active Learning Method for Spiking Neural Networks.

Sparsity May Cry: Let Us Fail (Current) Sparse Neural Networks Together!

CSNN: an Augmented Spiking Based Framework with Perceptron-Inception

Learning Spiking Neural Network from Easy to Hard task

An Efficient Learning Algorithm for Direct Training Deep Spiking Neural Networks

Neurogenesis Dynamics-inspired Spiking Neural Network Training Acceleration

Sparse Spiking Neural Network: Exploiting Heterogeneity in Timescales for Pruning Recurrent SNN

Pursing the Sparse Limitation of Spiking Deep Learning Structures

Neuro-Inspired Deep Neural Networks with Sparse, Strong Activations

A Comparative Study on the Performance and Security Evaluation of Spiking Neural Networks

Enhancing Adversarial Robustness in SNNs with Sparse Gradients

Deep belief networks with self-adaptive sparsity

The New Generation Brain-Inspired Sparse Learning: A Comprehensive Survey

Sparse Coding by Spiking Neural Networks: Convergence Theory and Computational Results

Log-sum enhanced sparse deep neural network

ESL-SNNs: An Evolutionary Structure Learning Strategy for Spiking Neural Networks