Abstract:A large number of multi-attribute group decisionmaking (MAGDM) have been widely introduced to obtain consensus results. However, most of the methodologies ignore the conflict among the experts opinions and only consider equal or variable priorities of them. Therefore, this study aims to propose an Evidential MAGDM method by assessing the inter-observational variability and handling uncertainty that emerges between the experts. The proposed framework has fourfold contributions. First, the basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method is introduced to consider the inherent characteristics of each alternative by computing the degree of belief. Second, the ordered weighted belief and plausibility measure is constructed to capture the overall intrinsic information of the alternative by assessing the inter-observational variability and addressing the conflicts emerging between the group of experts. An ordered weighted belief divergence measure is constructed to acquire the weighted support for each group of experts to obtain the final preference relationship. Finally, we have shown an illustrative example of the proposed Evidential MAGDM framework. Further, we have analyzed the interpretation of Evidential MAGDM in the real-world application for ensemble classifier feature fusion to diagnose retinal disorders using optical coherence tomography images.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the conflict and uncertainty among expert opinions in multi - attribute group decision - making (MAGDM). Specifically, traditional methods usually ignore the conflict among expert opinions and only consider equal or variable priorities. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a MAGDM method based on evidence theory to deal with the uncertainty among experts by evaluating the variability between observations. ### Detailed Explanation 1. **Research Background**: - Multi - attribute group decision - making (MAGDM) plays an important role in modern decision - making science and is widely used in fields such as medicine, management, and pattern analysis. - Most of the existing MAGDM methods ignore the conflict among expert opinions and only focus on the determination of expert weights, resulting in information loss and inaccurate results. 2. **Research Objectives**: - Propose a MAGDM framework based on evidence theory, and evaluate the confidence of each alternative by introducing the basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method. - Construct ordered weighted belief and plausibility measures to capture the overall internal information of alternatives and deal with the conflict among expert groups. - Propose an ordered weighted belief divergence measure to obtain the weighted support of each expert group, thereby obtaining the final preference relationship. 3. **Main Contributions**: - Introduce a new BPA generation method, taking into account the inherent characteristics of each alternative. - Construct ordered weighted belief and plausibility measures to evaluate the variability between observations and resolve the conflict among experts. - Propose an ordered weighted belief divergence measure to calculate the weighted support of each expert group. - Apply the proposed Evidential MAGDM framework for integrated classifier feature fusion to diagnose retinal diseases. 4. **Practical Applications**: - Demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through an example. - Apply the Evidential MAGDM method to integrated classifier feature fusion for diagnosing retinal diseases, showing its ability to handle uncertainty and behavior between observations. ### Key Concepts and Formulas Involved - **Basic Probability Assignment (BPA)**: \[ m(\emptyset) = 0, \quad \sum_{U \subseteq \Omega} m(U) = 1 \] - **Belief Function**: \[ Bel(U) = \sum_{A \subseteq U} m(A) \] - **Plausibility Function**: \[ Pl(U) = \sum_{A \cap U \neq \emptyset} m(A), \quad Pl(U) = 1 - Bel(U) \] - **Dempster's Combination Rule**: \[ (m_1 \oplus m_2)(A) = \begin{cases} \frac{\sum_{A_1 \cap A_2 = A} m_1(A_1) m_2(A_2)}{1 - K}, & A \neq \emptyset \\ 0, & A = \emptyset \end{cases} \] where \( K = \sum_{A_1 \cap A_2 = \emptyset} m_1(A_1) m_2(A_2) \) - **Ordered Weighted Belief Divergence Measure**: \[ Div_w(m_1, m_2) = \sum_{i = 1}^2 w_i \sum_{A_j \subseteq \Omega} WPBl_{m_{\sigma(i)}}(A_j) \log \frac{WPBl_{m_{\sigma(i)}}(A_j)}{w_1 WPBl_{m_{\sigma(1)}}(A_j) + w_2 WPBl_{m_{\sigma(2)}}(A_j)} \] Through this

Inter Observer Variability Assessment through Ordered Weighted Belief Divergence Measure in MAGDM Application to the Ensemble Classifier Feature Fusion

An Improved Belief Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making

Personalized Individual Semantics Based Approach to MAGDM with the Linguistic Preference Information on Alternatives.

A novel ORESTE approach for MAGDM incorporating probabilistic interval-valued linguistic information: case studies in higher education quality and the energy industry

Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics

GIBWM-MABAC approach for MAGDM under multi-granularity intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic information model

Superiority-comparison-based transformation, consensus, and ranking methods for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision-making

Trust and behavior analysis-based fusion method for heterogeneous multiple attribute group decision-making

An extension of multi-attribute group decision making method based on quantum-like Bayesian network considering the interference of beliefs

An extended multi-expert concept lattice-based heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision-making approach

APPROACHES TO MULTI-STAGE MULTI-ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING

Managing non-cooperative behaviors and ordinal consensus through a self-organized mechanism in multi-attribute group decision making

Multi-sensor data fusion based on a generalised belief divergence measure

Self-confidence and consensus-based group decision making methods and applications

An outranking approach for multi-attribute group decision-making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information

Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy

Weight assignment method for multiple attribute decision making with dissimilarity and conflict of belief distributions

Advanced linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric means for MAGDM

Improving consistency based on regret theory: A multi-attribute group decision making method with linguistic distribution assessments

Towards achieving consistent opinion fusion in group decision making with complete distributed preference relations

A concept lattice-based expert opinion aggregation method for multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information