Abstract:Effective human-robot teaming (HRT) increasingly requires humans to work with intelligent, autonomous machines. However, novel features of intelligent autonomous systems such as social agency and incomprehensibility may influence the human's trust in the machine. The human operator's mental model for machine functioning is critical for trust. People may consider an intelligent machine partner as either an advanced tool or as a human-like teammate. This article reports a study that explored the role of individual differences in the mental model in a simulated environment. Multiple dispositional factors that may influence the dominant mental model were assessed. These included the Robot Threat Assessment (RoTA), which measures the person's propensity to apply tool and teammate models in security contexts. Participants (N = 118) were paired with an intelligent robot tasked with making threat assessments in an urban setting. A transparency manipulation was used to influence the dominant mental model. For half of the participants, threat assessment was described as physics-based (e.g., weapons sensed by sensors); the remainder received transparency information that described psychological cues (e.g., facial expression). We expected that the physics-based transparency messages would guide the participant toward treating the robot as an advanced machine (advanced tool mental model activation), while psychological messaging would encourage perceptions of the robot as acting like a human partner (teammate mental model). We also manipulated situational danger cues present in the simulated environment. Participants rated their trust in the robot's decision as well as threat and anxiety, for each of 24 urban scenes. They also completed the RoTA and additional individual-difference measures. Findings showed that trust assessments reflected the degree of congruence between the robot's decision and situational danger cues, consistent with participants acting as Bayesian decision makers. Several scales, including the RoTA, were more predictive of trust when the robot was making psychology-based decisions, implying that trust reflected individual differences in the mental model of the robot as a teammate. These findings suggest scope for designing training that uncovers and mitigates the individual's biases toward intelligent machines.

Trust Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Interaction: Uncover Associations between Trust Dynamics and Personal Characteristics

Computational Modeling of the Dynamics of Human Trust During Human–Machine Interactions

A Case Study of Trust on Autonomous Driving

Building Trust Profiles in Conditionally Automated Driving

Personality Affects Dispositional Trust and History-Based Trust in Different Ways.

Modeling and Predicting Trust Dynamics in Human-Robot Teaming: A Bayesian Inference Approach

Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation

Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments

Dynamics of Trust in Automation and Interactive Decision Making During Driving Simulation Tasks

An Investigation of Drivers' Dynamic Situational Trust in Conditionally Automated Driving

Linking precursors of interpersonal trust to human-automation trust: An expanded typology and exploratory experiment

Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning

Personality Openness Predicts Driver Trust in Automated Driving

Atypical Dynamic Trust Learning in Individuals with High Autistic Traits in a Multi-Round Trust Game with Multiple Trustworthiness Cues

User Trust Dynamics

Do I Trust My Machine Teammate?

Enhancing component-specific trust with consumer automated systems through humanness design

Dynamic Human Trust Modeling of Autonomous Agents With Varying Capability and Strategy

Evaluating Effects of Enhanced Autonomy Transparency on Trust, Dependence, and Human-Autonomy Team Performance over Time

Anytime Trust Rating Dynamics in a Human-Robot Interaction Task

How Human-Automation Interaction Experiences, Trust Propensity and Dynamic Trust Affect Drivers’ Physiological Responses in Conditionally Automated Driving: Moderated Moderated-Mediation Analyses