Simulated performance of energy-resolving detectors towards exoplanet imaging with the Habitable Worlds Observatory

Sarah Steiger,Laurent Pueyo,Emiel H. Por,Pin Chen,Rémi Soummer,Raphaël Pourcelot,Iva Laginja,Vanessa P. Bailey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3020603

2024-09-10

Abstract:One of the primary science goals of the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) as defined by the Astro2020 decadal survey is the imaging of the first Earth-like planet around a Sun-like star. A key technology gap towards reaching this goal are the development of ultra-low-noise photon counting detectors capable of measuring the incredibly low count rates coming from these planets which are at contrasts of $\sim 1 \times 10^{-10}$. Superconducting energy-resolving detectors (ERDs) are a promising technology for this purpose as, despite their technological challenges, needing to be cooled below their superconducting transition temperature ($< 1\mathrm{K}$), they have essentially zero read noise, dark current, or clock-induced charge, and can get the wavelength of each incident photon without the use of additional throughput-reducing filters or gratings that spread light over many pixels. The use of these detectors on HWO will not only impact the science of the mission by decreasing the required exposure times for exo-Earth detection and characterization, but also in a wavefront sensing and control context when used for starlight suppression to generate a dark zone. We show simulated results using both an EMCCD and an ERD to ``dig a dark zone'' demonstrating that ERDs can achieve the same final contrast as an EMCCD in about half of the total time. We also perform a simple case study using an exposure time calculator tool called the Error Budget Software (EBS) to determine the required integration times to detect water for HWO targets of interest using both EMCCDs and ERDs. This shows that once a dark zone is achieved, using an ERD can decrease these exposure times by factors of 1.5--2 depending on the specific host star properties.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Earth and Planetary Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to solve the technical challenges faced when imaging Earth - like planets through the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO), especially how to achieve an ultra - low - noise photon - counting detector to measure the extremely low count rate (about 1 - 50 photons/micron per hour) from these planets. Specifically, the paper explores the application potential of Energy - Resolving Detectors (ERDs) in this task.

### Key Technical Challenges

1. **Extremely Low Signal - to - Noise Ratio**: Since the planetary signal is very weak (the contrast is about \(1\times10^{- 10}\)), traditional semiconductor detectors (such as CCD, EMCCD or CMOS) cannot provide sufficient signal - to - noise ratio (SNR) within a reasonable time.
2. **Readout Noise and Dark Current**: Traditional detectors have readout noise and dark current, which will further reduce the signal - to - noise ratio and affect the observation efficiency.
3. **Wavelength Resolution**: In order to detect biomarkers (such as the presence of water), high - resolution spectral information is required. Traditional methods usually rely on additional filters or gratings, which will reduce the flux and increase the complexity.

### Advantages of Energy - Resolving Detectors

ERDs have the following advantages:
- **Zero Readout Noise and Dark Current**: ERDs essentially have no readout noise, dark current or clock - induced charge (CIC), so they can significantly improve the signal - to - noise ratio.
- **Direct Acquisition of Spectral Information**: ERDs can directly measure the energy of each incident photon without using additional spectrometers or filters, thereby increasing the flux and simplifying the system design.
- **Radiation Hardness**: ERDs are not sensitive to radiation sources such as cosmic rays, will not cause long - term effects on the detector array, and these events can be easily identified and removed by post - processing.

### Research Content

The paper compares the performance of two detectors (EMCCD and ERD) in "digging a dark zone" and scientific exposure time through simulation experiments. The results show that:
- Using ERD can achieve the same final contrast as EMCCD in about half the time.
- After achieving the dark zone, using ERD can reduce the exposure time required to detect water by 1.5 to 2 times, depending on the characteristics of the host star.

### Conclusion

This study emphasizes the potential advantages of ERDs in the HWO mission, especially in reducing the time required to dig the dark zone and improving the efficiency of scientific data collection. Although ERDs need to be cooled to an extremely low temperature (<1K), their performance improvement is sufficient to compensate for this complexity and may make the mission goals of HWO a reality.