Jacques Trottier,William Van Woensel,Xiaoyang Wang,Kavya Mallur,Najah El-Gharib,Daniel Amyot
Abstract:We present a case study of Process Mining (PM) for personnel security screening in the Canadian government. We consider customer (process time) and organizational (cost) perspectives. Furthermore, in contrast to most published case studies, we assess the full process improvement lifecycle: pre-intervention analyses pointed out initial bottlenecks, and post-intervention analyses identified the intervention impact and remaining areas for improvement. Using PM techniques, we identified frequent exceptional scenarios (e.g., applications requiring amendment), time-intensive loops (e.g., employees forgetting tasks), and resource allocation issues (e.g., involvement of non-security personnel). Subsequent process improvement interventions, implemented using a flexible low-code digital platform, reduced security briefing times from around 7 days to 46 hours, and overall process time from around 31 days to 26 days, on average. From a cost perspective, the involvement of hiring managers and security screening officers was significantly reduced. These results demonstrate how PM can become part of a broader digital transformation framework to improve public service delivery. The success of these interventions motivated subsequent government PM projects, and inspired a PM methodology, currently under development, for use in large organizational contexts such as governments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the inefficiency of business processes faced by the Canadian government when providing digital services, especially the bottlenecks and excessive costs in the Personnel Security Screening (PSS) process. Specifically:
1. **Long process time**: The average processing time of the PSS process is approximately 30.9 days, with the security briefing part taking about 7 days.
2. **High cost**: It involves a large amount of human resources, especially with high participation of recruitment managers and security screening officers, resulting in unnecessary costs.
To improve these problems, the author used Process Mining (PM) technology to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the PSS process and evaluated the entire process improvement life cycle in the following ways:
- **Pre - intervention analysis**: Identify the initial bottlenecks.
- **Intervention measures**: Implement improvement measures, such as changing one - to - one security briefings to group briefings and finally to online video briefings.
- **Post - intervention analysis**: Evaluate the impact of the intervention measures and the remaining room for improvement.
Through these measures, the paper shows how to use PM technology to optimize government service delivery, especially to improve efficiency by reducing process time and cost.
### Main findings
1. **Data verification**: 48% of PSS applications are rejected after the initial submission, mainly due to problems such as incorrect name filling or expired identity documents. For this reason, short - term, medium - term and long - term improvement suggestions are proposed, such as adding online form prompts and using OCR technology to extract information.
2. **Event loop**: Multiple time - wasting loops are found, such as applicants not registering on the portal in a timely manner and recruitment managers not verifying identity documents in a timely manner. It is recommended that the system automatically send daily reminders to reduce these problems.
3. **Social network mining**: Through the handover - of - work model, it is found that security screening resources (such as security officers and security systems) are only involved in 28% of the process life cycle, and the participation of recruitment managers is also relatively high (26%), although this is not their main responsibility. This indicates that the security briefing is a major time - consuming point.
### Intervention measures and their effects
1. **Group briefing**: Transfer the security briefing responsibilities of recruitment managers to security officers and change from one - to - one briefings to group briefings at a fixed time every week. Results:
- **Process time**: The average processing time is reduced from 7 days to 4.6 days.
- **Cost**: The number of briefings is reduced by 60%, saving about 500 hours of recruitment managers' time.
2. **Video briefing**: Replace group briefings with non - proctored online video briefings, completely removing employee participation. Results:
- **Process time**: The average processing time is reduced from 4.6 days to 45.9 hours.
- **Cost**: Employee participation is completely eliminated, saving about 35 hours of security officers' time per year.
### Conclusion
Through the application of PM technology, the final intervention measures reduce the overall process time from 30.9 days to 25.8 days, significantly reducing costs and improving efficiency. These improvements are not only applicable to specific departments but can also be extended to other government departments, bringing broader time and cost benefits.
### Future work
The author proposes a PM methodology suitable for large - scale government organizations, emphasizing the importance of process selection, value establishment and domain understanding. In addition, PM technology will also support the digital transformation policy of the Canadian government to ensure the timeliness and cost - effectiveness of public services.