Abstract:This paper investigates how the OECD's global minimum tax (GMT) affects multinational enterprises (MNEs) behavior and countries' corporate taxes. We consider both profit shifting and capital investment responses of the MNE in a formal model of tax competition between asymmetric countries. The GMT reduces the true tax rate differential and benefits the large country, while the revenue effect is generally ambiguous for the small country. In the short run where tax rates are fixed, due to tax deduction of the substance-based income exclusion (SBIE), a higher minimum rate exerts investment incentives but also incurs a larger revenue loss for the small country. We show that under high (low) profit shifting costs the former (latter) effect dominates so that the small country's revenue increases (decreases). In the long run where countries can adjust tax rates, the GMT reshapes the tax game and the competition pattern. In contrast to the existing literature, we reveal that the minimum rate binds the small country only if it is low. With the rise of the GMT rate, countries will undercut the minimum to boost real investments and collect top-up taxes. For small market-size asymmetry and intermediate profit shifting cost, the revenue loss from the elimination of profit shifting may dominate the revenue gain from taxing the true profits generated by substantive activities, so that even a marginal GMT reform may harm the small country. Otherwise, it can raise the small country's tax revenue.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore how the Global Minimum Tax (GMT) proposed by the Organization for Economic Co - operation and Development (OECD) affects the behavior of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and corporate taxes in various countries. Specifically, the paper constructs a formal tax competition model including two countries with asymmetric market sizes and analyzes the impact of GMT on profit - shifting and capital investment responses. The following aspects are mainly studied: 1. **Short - term analysis**: - In the short term, when the corporate income tax rate is fixed, GMT reduces profit - shifting by reducing the difference in effective tax rates, which is beneficial to large countries, but the revenue effect on small countries is unclear. - Due to the Substantial Business Income Exclusion (SBIE), a higher GMT rate will encourage investment in low - tax - rate countries, thereby increasing the revenue of small countries. However, a higher GMT rate will also lead to a higher top - up tax rate, thereby increasing the revenue loss of small countries. - When the cost of profit - shifting is high, the investment incentive effect is dominant and the revenue of small countries increases; conversely, when the cost of profit - shifting is low, the revenue loss effect is dominant and the revenue of small countries decreases. 2. **Long - term analysis**: - In the long term, countries can adjust tax rates to maximize revenue. GMT reshapes the tax competition pattern and changes the competition mode. - When the GMT rate is low, small countries may be constrained by GMT. As the GMT rate increases, countries may set their tax rates below GMT to attract real investment and levy top - up taxes. - For cases with less market asymmetry and moderate profit - shifting costs, even marginal GMT reforms may damage the revenue of small countries, because the revenue loss from eliminating profit - shifting may exceed the revenue increase from taxing real economic activities. 3. **Policy recommendations**: - The paper points out that the implementation of GMT will not only affect the behavior of enterprises but also change the tax strategies of various countries. In particular, the existence of SBIE makes reducing tax rates can encourage real investment, but it may also lead to greater revenue losses. - Therefore, countries need to weigh these factors when formulating tax policies to achieve optimal tax effects. In conclusion, through theoretical models and analysis, this paper reveals the complex impacts of GMT on multinational enterprises and tax policies of various countries, providing an important reference for policy - makers.

The Global Minimum Tax, Investment Incentives and Asymmetric Tax Competition

A Global Minimum Tax for Large Firms Only: Implications for Tax Competition

Taxing the Second Nature ∗

A macroeconomic perspective on taxing multinational enterprises

Global corporate tax competition challenges climate change mitigation

Global Minimum Corporate Tax to Avoid Tax Avoidance

Productivity effects of corporate income tax: Evidence from China

The role of anti-tax avoidance in tax base flow and international tax competition

Leveling the playing field: Constraints on multinational profit shifting and the performance of national firms

Residual profit splitting: a theory-based approach to tax multinationals

Global corporate tax competition leads to unintended yet non-negligible climate impacts

Taxation of Foreign Profits with Heterogeneous Multinational Firms

Decomposing Multinational Corporations’ Declining Effective Tax Rates

Global corporate income tax competition, knowledge spillover, and growth

Attractive target for tax avoidance: trade liberalization and entry mode

Profit Shifting Frictions and the Geography of Multinational Activity

BEPS Project and International Tax Reform: The 2021 Agreements on Taxing Multinational Companies

Tax Treaty Obstacles in Implementing the Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax Rules and a Possible Solution for Eliminating the Various Challenges

Can a Single Country Increase the Taxes of Multinational Corporations? Evidence from the Impact of the 1993 Corporate Tax Rate Increase on Fortune 500 Companies

Double Counting Accounting: How Much Profit of Multinational Enterprises Is Really in Tax Havens?

Taxation models for international groups of companies