Abstract:Bell’s inequality is derived by resorting to a hidden-variable theory devised for resolving the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. The legitimacy of quantum superposition for describing the physical world is the essence of the debate. Einstein argued against the legitimacy of quantum superposition. Testing Bell’s inequality by experiments with the experimental results explained by Bell’s theorem opened the door to so-called quantum information technologies. In quantum information theory, “quantum bit” (or “qubit” for short) in a form of quantum superposition is supposed to represent quantum information. In the present paper, a new principle, the general principle of measurements, is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, the experiments for testing Bell’s inequality and so-called experimental evidence for physically realizable “qubit” are scrutinized. The findings are as follows. Although most physicists believe that Einstein’s vision of the physical world contradicts the experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality, actually Einstein’s viewpoint is irrelevant to Bell’s theorem. Bell’s inequality failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate. The experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality and the measurement outcomes of various experiments involving “qubit” are all erroneously explained. Without involving hidden variables, quantum mechanics can be completed based on the general principle of measurements by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space, and the mathematical setting can remain essentially unchanged. All kinds of “qubit” violate the general principle of measurements and can only describe imaginary objects that do not exist in the real world. A very regrettable conclusion from the above findings is inevitable: Quantum information has no physical carriers, and all quantum information technologies are not physically realizable.

Exploring quantum probability interpretations through artificial intelligence

Establishing a New Link between Fuzzy Logic, Neuroscience, and Quantum Mechanics through Bayesian Probability: Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence and Unconventional Computing

Quantum Mathematics in Artificial Intelligence

Quantum Correlation Revealed by Bell State for Classification Tasks

Interference Effects in Quantum Belief Networks

Study on Estimating Quantum Discord by Neural Network with Prior Knowledge

A New Method to Predict the Interference Effect in Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks

Quantum-Cognitive Neural Networks: Assessing Confidence and Uncertainty with Human Decision-Making Simulations

Quantum Circuits, Feature Maps, and Expanded Pseudo-Entropy: A Categorical Theoretic Analysis of Encoding Real-World Data into a Quantum Computer

Experimental Machine Learning of Quantum States

Quantum AI and hybrid simulators for a Universal Quantum Field Computation Model

A statistical model for quantum spin and photon number states

Entanglement transition in deep neural quantum states

On Purported Physical Realizations of So-called Quantum Information Technologies

On the Interpretability of Quantum Neural Networks

Uncertainty Measurement with Belief Entropy on the Interference Effect in the Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks.

Uncertainty measurement with belief entropy on interference effect in Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks

Testing quantum theory by generalizing noncontextuality

Demonstration of machine-learning-enhanced Bayesian quantum state estimation

Relative-belief inference in quantum information theory

Proposals for ruling out the real quantum theories in an entanglement-swapping quantum network with causally independent sources