From Finite to Continuous Phenotypes in (Visco-)Elastic Tissue Growth Models

Tomasz Dębiec,Mainak Mandal,Markus Schmidtchen
2024-09-05
Abstract:In this study, we explore a mathematical model for tissue growth focusing on the interplay between multiple cell subpopulations with distinct phenotypic characteristics. The model addresses the dynamics of tissue growth influenced by phenotype-dependent growth rates and collective population pressure, governed by Brinkman's law. We examine two primary objectives: the joint limit where viscosity tends to zero while the number of species approaches infinity, yielding an inviscid Darcy-type model with a continuous phenotype variable, and the continuous phenotype limit where the number of species becomes infinite with a fixed viscosity, resulting in a novel viscoelastic tissue growth model. In this sense, this paper provides a comprehensive framework that elucidates the relationships between four different modelling paradigms in tissue growth.
Analysis of PDEs
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the interactions among multiple cell sub - populations with different phenotypic characteristics in tissue growth by establishing a mathematical model. Specifically, this research focuses on two main objectives: 1. **Joint limit**: To study the transition from non - local, viscoelastic response to local, inviscid response when the viscosity approaches zero (i.e., the inviscid limit) and at the same time the number of species approaches infinity. This limiting process ultimately results in an inviscid Darcy - type model with a continuous phenotypic variable. 2. **Continuous phenotypic limit**: Let the number of different species approach infinity while keeping the viscosity coefficient \(\nu>0\) fixed. This limiting process provides a new viscoelastic tissue growth model with a continuous phenotypic variable. ### Specific problem description - **Background and motivation**: - In the study of tissue growth and multicellular aggregates, it is crucial to understand the interactions between different species or phenotypes and their impact on the overall behavior. - Mathematical models play an important role in revealing these complex interactions and predicting the behavior of biological systems under different conditions. - Structured models (considering the heterogeneity within the cell population) provide a more accurate representation of biological systems and can capture the dynamics of different cell types, their interactions, and their responses to environmental stimuli. - **Limitations of existing models**: - Existing models usually assume a finite number of phenotypes, which may not fully describe the phenotypic diversity in some cases (such as tumors). - Therefore, representing the phenotypic space as a continuous variable can reduce the complexity of the model while maintaining biological accuracy. - **Research methods**: - This study uses an \(N\)-species system, where \(n^{(i)}(x, t)\) represents the density of the \(i\) - th sub - population at position \(x\) and time \(t\). - Each species responds to the collective population pressure through Brinkman's law, and its growth dynamics is controlled by the phenotype - dependent growth rate. - The behavior of multiple species under different scale limits was studied, especially the joint limit and the continuous phenotypic limit. ### Main contributions - **Theoretical results**: - The continuous phenotypic entropy inequality was established, and the concept of weak solutions was introduced, and the entropy inequality was derived. These results play a crucial role in ensuring the stability and convergence of solutions. - The existence and convergence of solutions under the joint limit and the continuous phenotypic limit were proved. - **Application prospects**: - These models and theoretical results provide a new framework for understanding the complex dynamics in tissue growth, especially in the study of tumor growth and drug resistance. Through these studies, the author aims to provide a comprehensive framework to clarify the relationships among the four different paradigms in tissue growth modeling.