From Literature to Practice: Exploring Fairness Testing Tools for the Software Industry Adoption

Thanh Nguyen,Luiz Fernando de Lima,Maria Teresa Badassarre,Ronnie de Souza Santos
2024-09-04
Abstract:In today's world, we need to ensure that AI systems are fair and unbiased. Our study looked at tools designed to test the fairness of software to see if they are practical and easy for software developers to use. We found that while some tools are cost-effective and compatible with various programming environments, many are hard to use and lack detailed instructions. They also tend to focus on specific types of data, which limits their usefulness in real-world situations. Overall, current fairness testing tools need significant improvements to better support software developers in creating fair and equitable technology. We suggest that new tools should be user-friendly, well-documented, and flexible enough to handle different kinds of data, helping developers identify and fix biases early in the development process. This will lead to more trustworthy and fair software for everyone.
Software Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the practicality and applicability problems of fairness testing tools in the software industry. With the wide application of artificial intelligence and machine - learning technologies in software systems, ensuring the fairness of these technologies has become crucial. However, existing fairness testing tools have many deficiencies in practical applications, especially in terms of user - friendliness, detailed documentation, and support for diverse datasets. These problems limit the effective use of these tools in an industrial environment. #### Specific problems include: 1. **Lack of user - friendliness**: Many fairness testing tools are difficult to use and lack an intuitive user interface and detailed usage guides. 2. **Incomplete documentation**: The documentation of existing tools is often not detailed enough, causing users to encounter difficulties during the installation and use process. 3. **Poor configuration flexibility**: These tools can usually only handle specific types of datasets and lack support for diverse data, which limits their universality and extensibility. 4. **Low update frequency**: Some tools have hardly been updated since their release and cannot keep up with the pace of technological development, affecting their long - term usability and effectiveness. #### Research objectives: - **Evaluate the practicality of existing tools**: Through literature review and heuristic evaluation, study the applicability and effectiveness of 41 existing fairness testing tools in the actual industrial environment. - **Identify the advantages and disadvantages of tools**: Analyze the performance of these tools in terms of installation process, user interface, documentation support, and update frequency, and find out their strengths and limitations. - **Propose improvement suggestions**: According to the evaluation results, it is recommended to develop fairness testing tools that are more in line with industry needs, improve the user - friendliness, documentation integrity, and configuration flexibility of the tools, so as to better support software developers in creating fair and unbiased technologies. Through this research, the author hopes to provide valuable insights for software developers, helping them select and utilize appropriate tools to detect and fix biases in software systems, thereby promoting more trustworthy and fair software development practices.