The Complexity of Drawing Graphs on Few Lines and Few Planes
Steven Chaplick,Krzysztof Fleszar,Fabian Lipp,Alexander Ravsky,Oleg Verbitsky,Alexander Wolff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7155/jgaa.00630
2024-03-01
Abstract:It is well known that any graph admits a crossing-free straight-line drawing in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and that any planar graph admits the same even in $\mathbb{R}^2$. For a graph $G$ and $d \in \{2,3\}$, let $\rho^1_d(G)$ denote the smallest number of lines in $\mathbb{R}^d$ whose union contains a crossing-free straight-line drawing of $G$. For $d=2$, $G$ must be planar. Similarly, let $\rho^2_3(G)$ denote the smallest number of planes in $\mathbb{R}^3$ whose union contains a crossing-free straight-line drawing of $G$.
We investigate the complexity of computing these three parameters and obtain the following hardness and algorithmic results.
- For $d\in\{2,3\}$, we prove that deciding whether $\rho^1_d(G)\le k$ for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$ is ${\exists\mathbb{R}}$-complete.
- Since $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq{\exists\mathbb{R}}$, deciding $\rho^1_d(G)\le k$ is NP-hard for $d\in\{2,3\}$. On the positive side, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$.
- Since ${\exists\mathbb{R}}\subseteq\mathrm{PSPACE}$, both $\rho^1_2(G)$ and $\rho^1_3(G)$ are computable in polynomial space. On the negative side, we show that drawings that are optimal with respect to $\rho^1_2$ or $\rho^1_3$ sometimes require irrational coordinates.
- We prove that deciding whether $\rho^2_3(G)\le k$ is NP-hard for any fixed $k \ge 2$. Hence, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$ unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$.
Computational Complexity,Computational Geometry