Time-series Crime Prediction Across the United States Based on Socioeconomic and Political Factors

Patricia Dao,Jashmitha Sappa,Saanvi Terala,Tyson Wong,Michael Lam,Kevin Zhu
2024-09-01
Abstract:Traditional crime prediction techniques are slow and inefficient when generating predictions as crime increases rapidly \cite{r15}. To enhance traditional crime prediction methods, a Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit model was constructed using datasets involving gender ratios, high school graduation rates, political status, unemployment rates, and median income by state over multiple years. While there may be other crime prediction tools, personalizing the model with hand picked factors allows a unique gap for the project. Producing an effective model would allow policymakers to strategically allocate specific resources and legislation in geographic areas that are impacted by crime, contributing to the criminal justice field of research \cite{r2A}. The model has an average total loss value of 70.792.30, and a average percent error of 9.74 percent, however both of these values are impacted by extreme outliers and with the correct optimization may be corrected.
Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of predicting crime based on socio-economic and political factors in different states of the United States. Specifically, the goals of this paper are: 1. **Improving traditional crime prediction methods**: Traditional crime prediction techniques are slow and inefficient in generating predictions, especially in situations where crime rates are rapidly increasing. Therefore, the paper attempts to enhance these traditional methods through artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques. 2. **Building an efficient model**: Researchers utilized datasets including gender ratio, high school graduation rate, political status, unemployment rate, and median income to construct a model that combines Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). 3. **Personalizing the model to fill research gaps**: By selecting specific socio-economic and political factors, the model can provide personalized crime prediction results for different geographic areas, thereby helping policymakers better allocate resources and legislate. 4. **Improving crime prediction accuracy**: Despite some limitations and bias issues, the model aims to improve prediction accuracy by optimizing algorithms and increasing data volume, ultimately achieving more effective crime prevention measures.